![]() |
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
MURICAN
|
I allready made that offer. Ill read it then send it to someone else.
|
![]() The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers and be capable of reading them. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
Almost there...
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,979
Internets: 161638
|
I don't understand why everyone is so eager to read this book. I'm sure it's good, but it's not going to be anything you haven't heard/thought/read before. It's just going to confirm and reinforce beliefs the majority of you already have. If you want to challenge yourself read something that's well written by an intelligent person (Ph.D in their field) that is the opposite of what you already believe, and see if it persuades you or strengthens your pre-existing conviction(s).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 (permalink) | |
|
Level 20 Holothetan
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Space
Posts: 5,245
Internets: 210144
|
Quote:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 13,643
Internets: 247330
|
While it's sad you think someone needs a Ph.D in their field to be considered intelligent enough to speak on a subject, I can tell you that, as far as I know, Sam Harris is knocking on the door of a Ph.D in nueroscience and that his beliefs are the opposite of what you seem to adhere to.
Perhaps you might read this book if I sent it to you? When I made that initial offer, I was hoping you, above anyone else, would be the one to request it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) |
|
Almost there...
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,979
Internets: 161638
|
I think you've gotten the wrong impression. Obviously somebody can be intelligent without a Ph.D, I was, for the most part, covering my bases with that comment. Regardless, it certainly lends one credibility. I'm sure Mr. Harris is a very smart guy either way.
I've read Nietzsche, Foucault, Dawkins...I know what the arguments against faith and God are, and no offense to Mr. Harris, but I doubt he has much new to say that the other great thinkers I've mentioned have already said. That's not even the point though. My point is more and more people these days want to find a reason to not believe in God. That's fine. But at this point it's become one big circle jerk where they all read and think the same thing. As I stated earlier, if you want to challenge yourself and expand your horizons, read something you disagree with. Take on another point of view. If you're already athiest then why read something you already think you know? |
|
Last edited by Repugnant Abomination; 02-14-2007 at 02:33 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) |
|
Poor Sport
|
I've got a great book on religion that I saved from a class on the philosophy of religion. The book is called "Philosophy of Religion" : Selected Readings from the Oxford University Press.
If you are actually interested in it, im sure most of the essays are online somewhere. There is a shitton of great stuff in here, let me know what you are interested in and I can suggest something on it. All the classic religious essays are in here, but some of the ones that you may or may not have heard of that you need to read are: "Divine Omniscience and Voluntary Action" by Nelson Pike "Evill Makes a Strong Case Against God's Existence" by David Hume "Resurrection of the Person" by John Hicks "Ethics Without Religion" by Kai Nelson "Ethics and Natural Law" by Thomas Aquinas |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 13,643
Internets: 247330
|
Quote:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) |
|
Almost there...
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,979
Internets: 161638
|
Of course it sounds familiar, thats the point. Youre doing the exact same thing that the religious people you cant stand are doing. Why doesnt the same thing apply to you? Instead of trying to force your beliefs on someone you should swap beliefs for a day and then talk about it. Really this whole thing has gotten blown out of proportion. I'm sure it's a good book and you just feel like sharing it.
|
|
Last edited by Repugnant Abomination; 02-14-2007 at 04:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 (permalink) |
|
MURICAN
|
if you really wanna send me shit via. UPS I'll PM you my address, this could make a good thread
|
![]() The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers and be capable of reading them. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) | |
|
Poor Sport
|
http://www.amazon.com/Atlas-Streets-Ring-Struggle-Become/dp/0060542403
![]() Atlas: From the Streets to the Ring: A Son's Struggle to Become a Man Quote:
He manages to avoid trying to sound like a badass, although seems to brag a time or two. His stories are great, from growing up on Staten Island, going to Rikers, getting his face sliced open (still has a prominant scar), training kids with Cus D'mato in Catskill and driving them down to the Bronx to fight, putting a guy in Mike Tyson's ear, having Sammy the Bull Gravano pay for his gym membership and lift weights with him for a year, training a ballerina to get her in shape, etc. Not all the stories are tough guy stuff either, he seems to have a good grip on human pyschology. On top of the book he is one of the real good guys for boxing, and probably the best sports commentator on the air, makes boxing understandable to people whove never watched a fight let alone put on gloves while still explaining every technical detail. He really understands and explains the mental aspect of fighting and how a fighter has to consciously make the decision to not look for a way out. | |
|
Last edited by Beebs; 02-20-2007 at 07:40 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) | |
|
MURICAN
|
Quote:
GWB's review: I didn't like the book very much. It's too short (a couple of magazine articles in length or so), uses Straw Man arguments too often, and doesn't give me anything I didn't know already (maybe just because I'm so damn smart already?). I was especially appalled by his "use" of statistics, made me nauseous, but someone who isn't interested in economics probably wouldn't mind too much. Some of the book wasn't too bad. Essentially he attacks anti-evolutionists (is that a word?) pretty well, if you don't believe in some form of evolution you are either ignorant or a fucking moron basically. And he spends about 20 pages or so paraphrasing The Problem of Evil , but in an unscientific way, with no references to academia. But as promised to UB: if anyone else wants to read this lil diddy, pm me your address and I'll UPS it ASAP, so long as you promise to read it and send it on to the next sucker. | |
![]() The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers and be capable of reading them. ![]() Last edited by DJ FC; 02-21-2007 at 04:37 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) |
|
I make bad decisions.
|
![]() Pretty solid read. The first 30 pages or so were monotonous and I was REALLY hoping the entire book would not be of the same structure. I was extremely happy that the pace changed up. Read it in two nights at work while sitting at an "X." There were quite a few parts that had me literally laughing out loud, one in particular, probably the hardest I've ever laughed at reading ever. ![]() Damn, I loved this book. It has some great travel ideas and some pretty humorous things to do locally as well. The majority of it focuses on travel and other adventures. A lot of it is common knowledge, but a lot of things you may not have known about as well as recommendations on good times/ways to do them. Starting "The Reaper's Line" tomorrow. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 (permalink) |
|
Spice Master
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,969
Internets: 278288
|
Hey guys, check out this awesome thread I found by DJ FC. It's old too! Over a year older than some other forums that deal with the same topic, but have dishonest, non-inclusive titles. Since it has thread seniority and all, and nobody gives a shit about Repug slowly becoming a religious apologist, we should revive it!
![]() I'm halfway finished with American Gods by Neil Gaiman. The basic plot is that all gods (and other objects of human worship) are real as long as there is some dwindling belief in them. America, being the melting pot/salad bowl that it is, has a huge amount of gods because of all the immigrants over the past few centuries who "bring their gods with them", and, after belief in them dies, they lose their powers and influence and become normal people, tricking, seducing etc. to leech what little belief they can from humans to get by. Anyways, there's another overarching plot that everything is leading up to, but it's a great read and fun to try to guess who the gods in question are before they are revealed to you through hints. Almost nobody straight out says "Hi, i'm ___________, the god of ______________" --- a lot of it you have to pick up through conversational nuance or inferences. Fantastic book so far. First Gaiman book I've read, and I really like his writing style. I highly recommend it. Oh, also, HBO is turning it into a series next year, so you know it's gotta be at least fairly good. |
|
Psychedelics are illegal not because a loving government is concerned that you may jump out of a third story window. Psychedelics are illegal because they dissolve opinion structures and culturally laid down models of behavior and information processing.
― Terence McKenna |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 (permalink) | |
|
Don't call me Shirley
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: London
Posts: 3,271
Internets: 220249
|
Quote:
| |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#48 (permalink) |
|
Spice Master
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,969
Internets: 278288
|
I'm dying to find out what kind of Native American motherfucker Shadow is and why everybody is on his nuts. I thus far have discovered he somehow controls weather and seems to be a reincarnation, which would explain his lack of memory except through residual dreams, but don't spoil anything for me -- i'll be done in a week.
|
|
Psychedelics are illegal not because a loving government is concerned that you may jump out of a third story window. Psychedelics are illegal because they dissolve opinion structures and culturally laid down models of behavior and information processing.
― Terence McKenna |
|
|
|
|