|
Notices |
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-09-2011, 12:50 AM | #26 (permalink) |
Almost there...
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,979
Internets: 161638
|
Yeah seriously, wtf. I've had a full time job for a few years now and pay my taxes just like everyone else. And Mistoffelees hit the nail on the head: it's easy to be for less taxes when you're still living a cush life on your parents dime.
I'm not for over taxation of any kind. I think some are really important, but of course too many are bad, and of course the incentive should always be for people to work and not leech off the system. |
07-09-2011, 01:06 AM | #28 (permalink) |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,113
Internets: 284753
|
It's easier to be for less taxes when you aren't paying taxes than it is when you are? That doesn't make a lot of sense.
I'm against taxes because any type of institution that benefits from all your upside but absorbs none of your downside is bullshit. I don't have to pay taxes or be poor to know bullshit when I see it. |
07-09-2011, 02:34 AM | #32 (permalink) |
Spice Master
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,969
Internets: 278288
|
And yet, despite having only a 6 month age gap, I have worked some form of a job since I was 16, therefore still have contributed more taxes to the US government than you, despite being out of country for 2 and a half years. I shall continue to speak!
|
07-09-2011, 06:39 AM | #33 (permalink) | |
Ahoy Fuckbag
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: In a pineapple under the sea
Posts: 3,540
Internets: 187030
|
Quote:
Yeah, that tax money is just absorbing all your upsides and none of your downsides ... lets not talk about creating jobs, for example: accountants. | |
Quote:
|
||
07-09-2011, 06:43 AM | #34 (permalink) |
MURICAN
|
|
The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers and be capable of reading them. |
|
07-09-2011, 06:46 AM | #35 (permalink) |
MURICAN
|
DH is kind of right here though:
The most you can get out of the government on the downside is a very minimal and miserable living. But on the upside they take from you a massive chunk of your wealth. |
The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers and be capable of reading them. |
|
07-09-2011, 06:49 AM | #36 (permalink) |
MURICAN
|
Also: DD please don't argue that when the government taxes us that 100% of that tax money is effeciently used. Please don't try to argue that there isn't government waste and inefficiency. In reality there's probably more waste and inefficiency than value put back into socienty.
|
The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers and be capable of reading them. |
|
07-09-2011, 08:37 AM | #38 (permalink) |
MURICAN
|
Of course!
What I'm saying is this: when it comes to government you always get less than you pay for. |
The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers and be capable of reading them. |
|
07-09-2011, 09:42 AM | #40 (permalink) |
Gangnam Style
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DH's Massage Parlor
Posts: 6,383
Internets: 213510
|
AP - you're dead wrong on everything you've said about my personal finances outside of the currently "unemployed" comment. That doesn't mean I'm still not generated a revenue through multiple other sources. This thread is a rarity in which I see you making bigoted comments.
|
07-09-2011, 11:37 AM | #41 (permalink) | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,113
Internets: 284753
|
Quote:
When I'm refering to upside and downside, I'm talking about when you're making money and when you're losing money. I look at this from the standpoint of a business owner. When you lose money, the most you can do is a loss carryback for two years. You can do a loss carry forward, but that's only going to help if you start making money again. I guess, if you're paying the AMT, that you can do a NOL deduction. This is very little downside absorption. As far as your talk of job creation goes, give me a fucking break. The government creates regulation which costs businesses billions of dollars. Oh, but yes, they must hire more people to follow these regulations. I like how you assume that I will ever receive medicare or social security when I'm older. Fat chance that'll happen. | |
Last edited by Saint DH; 07-09-2011 at 11:44 AM. |
||
07-09-2011, 12:20 PM | #42 (permalink) |
Gangnam Style
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DH's Massage Parlor
Posts: 6,383
Internets: 213510
|
To further my stance that, I'm "unemployed" and could file for unemployment benefits, but I do not believe it is the governments role to play Robin Hood and will not apply for it.
|
07-09-2011, 12:43 PM | #43 (permalink) |
MURICAN
|
|
The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers and be capable of reading them. |
|
07-10-2011, 07:06 AM | #50 (permalink) | |
Ahoy Fuckbag
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: In a pineapple under the sea
Posts: 3,540
Internets: 187030
|
Quote:
Example: Roads. You are a businessman, are you going to pay for the roads that connect my residence to your business so that I can make it to you? How about from other people's houses? Which group of businesses are going to band together to create bridges and highways? These are capital intensive projects that can easily argued were done far over an efficient cost but have benefited this country and vicariously the ADVANCEMENT OF THE ENTIRE WORLD ECONOMY. Nobody can argue that the government efficiently uses our money, but to act like the benefits of your taxation don't far outweigh the costs is a bit of a stretch. | |
Quote:
|
||
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Joke of the Day | Orgazmo | General Chat | 277 | 04-03-2013 08:24 AM |
COOL HAND LUKE IS DEAD! (and he's never coming back} | Mr. Blonde | News | 6 | 09-28-2008 05:08 AM |