Although I can't speak for malibu, I think she meant four things by her previous posts.
1. In her personal, moral beliefs, it is wrong for a 25 year old to hit on a 17 year old. In other words, large differences in maturity quantified by large differences in age make sexual advances of this nature morally wrong.
2. In society's view, it unacceptable for a 25 year old to hit on a 17 year old, hence the law of consent.
3. She then switched to saying it's not morally wrong so you would stfu and leave her alone. Maybe?
4. She wants to jump on my bone.
|