View Single Post
Unread 12-13-2010, 01:02 AM   #149 (permalink)
SinisterKid
Hide your nieces.
 
SinisterKid's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 293
Internets: 7656
SinisterKid has a reputation beyond repute SinisterKid has a reputation beyond repute SinisterKid has a reputation beyond repute SinisterKid has a reputation beyond repute SinisterKid has a reputation beyond repute SinisterKid has a reputation beyond repute SinisterKid has a reputation beyond repute SinisterKid has a reputation beyond repute SinisterKid has a reputation beyond repute SinisterKid has a reputation beyond repute SinisterKid has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Blonde View Post
I wouldn't doubt it.

WIKILEAKS founder Julian Assange's lawyer said he has seen secret police documents that prove the whistle-blower is innocent of sex assault claims made against him by two women

Rape case aside, it's been said the US is going to charge him of spying. How is that going to work when there are myriad other news companies (which is what wikileaks is) that also posted leaked information?
Not really sure, sounds like a weak charge. What's interesting though and often overlooked - or misunderstood - is that the source document leaked still maintains its classification as confidential, secret, top secret, etc., despite being publicized. My employer sent out mass emails last week requesting that, as employees, we not access the Wikileaks site, as that would essentially be accessing classified documents on work and/or personal computers. The reporting and summarizing of the leaks by news outlets is still game though.
SinisterKid is offline   Reply With Quote