Was 9/11 an inside job? - Nubblies.net Forums

f3lix · 08-17-2004, 12:46 AM

Nubblites, I've been rummaging about looking through different web sites, theories, data, and the such, and I have come to the conclusion that through numerous video feeds and scientific theories, that 9/11 was much more than hijackers attacking America.

For some of you, this might seem impossible and will want to think there is no way it could happen...for those of you, I am sorry. For the rest of you that have an open mind, please take a look at the data, as it speaks for itself.

Numerous web sites have theories, but I'm going to try to summarize them here. First, go to letsroll911.org Scroll down to the video feed that shows the "missile attack 1/3 of a second before impact". Just look at it for a while. Much of the other concepts on that side are farfetched, so in saving yourself wasted time, I'd suggest you head on over to http://www.farmingdaleweather.net/vi...its.gp.med.asf Some of you may have already seen this "firemans video" from the attack on the first WTC building. Now, I ask you to take a closer look and see the explosion before the plane impact Tower 1. http://webfairy.911review.org/video/firsthit.detail.mov If you think this video is rigged, go ahead and take a look at the Fireman's video again with what you have just seen in memory. See it now?

What do you think about this? The government has mentioned nothing about missle attacks on the WTC, nor has the media. The evidence is in front of you.

The controlled demolition of the WTC Towers and Building 7.

Many theories, using science, have shown it to be impossible for a 767 plane to have enough fuel and to burn hot enough to melt the core steel beams of the WTC towers. Some have thought the use of thermite had to occur. Others have thought that the buildings were already rigged with explosives and were detonated. There are several theories, but all of them share one thing in common. The planes' fuel could not burn hot enough to melt the steel beams.

thermite theory
video of charges going off
video of demolition squibs shooting out of the tower

The Twin Towers exploded outwards as far as 70 m.

The tremendous force exploded the walls and entire structure out horizontally.
The buildings came down in about the same time as a free fall - there was no friction of a collapse.
The buildings were exploded into fine dust, not collapsed pieces. Where does the energy come from to turn all this reinforced concrete into dust?
NYFD discusses WTC tower falling

Jet fuel can't melt steel:

No fire in history has lead to the collapse of a steel office building, even after hours of raging fires; when the Twin Towers exploded, the fires had almost gone out.
The temperatures measured of the core of the rubble, five days later, exceed the maximum temperature for a kerosene fire.
The maximum temperature for a kerosene fire is insufficient to melt steel; to use jet fuel to melt steel would be an amazing discovery.

We know for certain that WTC building 7 was demolished by explosives. Easily proven by the owner of the building admitting it...In a September 2002 PBS documentary called 'America Rebuilds,' Silverstein states, in reference to World Trade Center Building 7, "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." play the second video from the top to see this
The Pentagon attack

Simply stated, there was a world of footage include pictures, video, and audio about the WTC attacks, but where is all of the evidence regarding the Pentagon Attack?

The only pictoral evidence shown here shows no plane, but only a white cloud following the suppossed Commercial airliner. Did you notice anything odd there? Maybe...a missing frame? Science also gives us evidence that the "white tail" following a plane only occurs at high altitudes, as the particles are frozen by the air tempeture in the stratosphere. So how did we have this white tail on ground?

Who was driving this plane?

Do you recall when we were told about the hijackers taking flying lessons 6 months before the attacks? So do I. But sit back and think about this...how did a person with less than 6 months of flying experience manage to hit a building on the first floor, traveling at 500 mph and only caused this much less damage than what we saw at the WTC? Dulles Airport Traffic Controller said this... "The speed, the maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic controllers, that that was a military plane....And it went six, five, four. And I had it in my mouth to say, three, and all of a sudden the plane turned away. In the room, it was almost a sense of relief. This must be a fighter. This must be one of our guys sent in, scrambled to patrol our capital, and to protect our president, and we sat back in our chairs and breathed for just a second".

Oddly enough, the grass seems fine
But wait...why is there gravel and sand being poured over it?
And where is the part of the Pentagon where the wings of the plane entered? Doesn't it seem odd?

I am sure several of you will write this off as impossible, but I hope that you think about it. Just think how big and powerful the US Federal Government has become because of these events and think back to whether or not it is impossible.

08-17-2004, 12:46 AM	#1 (permalink)
f3lix Gangnam Style Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: DH's Massage Parlor Posts: 6,383 Internets: 213510	Nubblites, I've been rummaging about looking through different web sites, theories, data, and the such, and I have come to the conclusion that through numerous video feeds and scientific theories, that 9/11 was much more than hijackers attacking America. For some of you, this might seem impossible and will want to think there is no way it could happen...for those of you, I am sorry. For the rest of you that have an open mind, please take a look at the data, as it speaks for itself. Numerous web sites have theories, but I'm going to try to summarize them here. First, go to letsroll911.org Scroll down to the video feed that shows the "missile attack 1/3 of a second before impact". Just look at it for a while. Much of the other concepts on that side are farfetched, so in saving yourself wasted time, I'd suggest you head on over to http://www.farmingdaleweather.net/vi...its.gp.med.asf Some of you may have already seen this "firemans video" from the attack on the first WTC building. Now, I ask you to take a closer look and see the explosion before the plane impact Tower 1. http://webfairy.911review.org/video/firsthit.detail.mov If you think this video is rigged, go ahead and take a look at the Fireman's video again with what you have just seen in memory. See it now? What do you think about this? The government has mentioned nothing about missle attacks on the WTC, nor has the media. The evidence is in front of you. The controlled demolition of the WTC Towers and Building 7. Many theories, using science, have shown it to be impossible for a 767 plane to have enough fuel and to burn hot enough to melt the core steel beams of the WTC towers. Some have thought the use of thermite had to occur. Others have thought that the buildings were already rigged with explosives and were detonated. There are several theories, but all of them share one thing in common. The planes' fuel could not burn hot enough to melt the steel beams. thermite theory video of charges going off video of demolition squibs shooting out of the tower The Twin Towers exploded outwards as far as 70 m. </font> The tremendous force exploded the walls and entire structure out horizontally.</font> The buildings came down in about the same time as a free fall - there was no friction of a collapse.</font> The buildings were exploded into fine dust, not collapsed pieces. Where does the energy come from to turn all this reinforced concrete into dust?</font> NYFD discusses WTC tower falling</font> Jet fuel can't melt steel: </font> No fire in history has lead to the collapse of a steel office building, even after hours of raging fires; when the Twin Towers exploded, the fires had almost gone out.</font> The temperatures measured of the core of the rubble, five days later, exceed the maximum temperature for a kerosene fire.</font> The maximum temperature for a kerosene fire is insufficient to melt steel; to use jet fuel to melt steel would be an amazing discovery.</font> We know for certain that WTC building 7 was demolished by explosives. Easily proven by the owner of the building admitting it...In a September 2002 PBS documentary called 'America Rebuilds,' Silverstein states, in reference to World Trade Center Building 7, "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." play the second video from the top to see this The Pentagon attack Simply stated, there was a world of footage include pictures, video, and audio about the WTC attacks, but where is all of the evidence regarding the Pentagon Attack? The only pictoral evidence shown here shows no plane, but only a white cloud following the suppossed Commercial airliner. Did you notice anything odd there? Maybe...a missing frame? Science also gives us evidence that the "white tail" following a plane only occurs at high altitudes, as the particles are frozen by the air tempeture in the stratosphere. So how did we have this white tail on ground? Who was driving this plane? Do you recall when we were told about the hijackers taking flying lessons 6 months before the attacks? So do I. But sit back and think about this...how did a person with less than 6 months of flying experience manage to hit a building on the first floor, traveling at 500 mph and only caused this much less damage than what we saw at the WTC? Dulles Airport Traffic Controller said this... "The speed, the maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic controllers, that that was a military plane....And it went six, five, four. And I had it in my mouth to say, three, and all of a sudden the plane turned away. In the room, it was almost a sense of relief. This must be a fighter. This must be one of our guys sent in, scrambled to patrol our capital, and to protect our president, and we sat back in our chairs and breathed for just a second". Oddly enough, the grass seems fine But wait...why is there gravel and sand being poured over it? And where is the part of the Pentagon where the wings of the plane entered? Doesn't it seem odd? I am sure several of you will write this off as impossible, but I hope that you think about it. Just think how big and powerful the US Federal Government has become because of these events and think back to whether or not it is impossible.