View Single Post
Unread 11-10-2003, 11:49 PM   #7 (permalink)
victim
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 985
Internets: 10
victim is on a distinguished road
Post

Not exactly. Neither of the two faster machines are x86 based systems (i.e. they don't have an Intel or AMD chipset)... #1 cost $350 million, and #2 cost more than $40 million, and this new Mac cluster (Big Mac), cost less than $5.5 million and might prove to be faster than the #2 machine. (The #4 machine is a $35 million dollar cluster of Xeon processors that can't even hold a match to the Mac supercomputer).

get off my internet!!!
victim is offline   Reply With Quote