Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Blonde
|
So the most important line in this article for me seems to be:
Quote:
|
Decades of economic theory "usually considers entrepreneurs" as people who "innovate and render aging technologies obsolete"
|
These aging technologies are in industries that have become monolithic ... vast empires if you will ... for example, telephone companies. Land lines are a couple of decades from being completely gone, few people keep them in their homes because it's a redundant cost. Fortunately a number of telephone companies have worked their way into cell phones / internet providing, but for every phone company keeping pace (while still thinning irrelevant jobs) there is a post service thinning jobs year after year in a shrinking industry that will never turn around. What sort of economic endgame is even possible in a world where the population continues to spiral upwards and new technologies are constantly popping up removing the jobs, relevance, and profitability from older companies?