View Single Post
Unread 08-09-2012, 11:46 PM   #4 (permalink)
f3lix
Gangnam Style
 
f3lix's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DH's Massage Parlor
Posts: 6,383
Internets: 213510
f3lix has a reputation beyond repute f3lix has a reputation beyond repute f3lix has a reputation beyond repute f3lix has a reputation beyond repute f3lix has a reputation beyond repute f3lix has a reputation beyond repute f3lix has a reputation beyond repute f3lix has a reputation beyond repute f3lix has a reputation beyond repute f3lix has a reputation beyond repute f3lix has a reputation beyond repute

For Shameful Transgressions
Default

So many things to consider:

How great they were for their time
Do their records/times/marks still hold compared to today's athletes
Is it based on talent or awards/medals/titles
Was their competition of noteworthiness

Consider this - the greatest composers and films have stood the test of time, so how do athletes measure up in that sense? Yes, athletes are trained better now, but aren't the youth in both music and film? Why do athletic marks keep falling year after year, yet talent in the arts does not? Just something to consider when looking across the fields of other disciplines when discussing the greatest athlete ever.
f3lix is offline   Reply With Quote