Quote:
Originally Posted by George W. Bush
What about con men?
|
Unless the guy is more of a strong arm than a conman, he and the other party entered into an agreement that they both had thought about and determined to be mutually beneficial; why should one guy be at fault if the other is a complete idiot?
Thats the wonderful thing about freedom; people will not enter into an agreement unless they believe it to be beneficial; and since it necessarily involves two or more parties, that means nothing happens without consent and believing that the deal is mutually beneficial.
Arbitrarily interfering with that process by means of a socialist government who feels that the people can't be trusted to make their own decision, means there are no mutually beneficial agreements because their is no need for it; people stop thinking about what actually works, and start thinking they know whats best for other people, rather than worrying about themselves.
Like two certain fucking morons on this site.