I think Kremlin was pointing out that, relative to their responsibilities, political officers are quite underpaid. However, as f3lix pointed out, they receive non monetary compensation benefits which are highly valued. The value of these extra benefits are, of course, scaled with the level of responsibility required for the given position. One might say that the reason for low monetary compensation is to eliminate the desire for monetary gain by being elected to public office, thereby placing those whose main concern is for the benefit of the public into office. However, this is seemingly neutralized by the excess of auxiliary benefits. I think it's fair to say that politicians are more than generously compensated for their work. If they were not, I don't see how so many would aspire to take on the costs of running a successful campaign.
|