While definitely far from conclusive, the Miller-Urey experiment offers some fantastic grounds for a possible origin of life, and a much more feasible one than involving a deity:
In regard to your information inquiry, Dawkins covered that at length here:
The Information Challenge | Australian Skeptics
"Attacks" are only good when they are based on healthy scientific debate, not just clambering for any Biblical excuse possible with practically no evidence whatsoever to support it. I like the quote from
this article:
Quote:
|
If there were credible scientific evidence against evolution, scientists would be the first to discover it, the first to publish it in peer-reviewed journals, and the first to debate its validity and importance. After all, discovering credible scientific evidence against evolution would be a revolutionary accomplishment, worthy of a Nobel Prize. That’s why accusations from creationists and intelligent design advocates that scientists are conspiring to suppress evidence against evolution are, to put it mildly, silly.
|