Lesser of Three Evils - Nubblies.net Forums

cough man · 07-24-2004, 03:44 AM

Bush vs. Kerry vs. Nadir

Who do you think? Honestly the only reason I would choose Bush is because he is just SOL for his last term. He basically got handed a bad economy and a country under constant threats from terrorists. I think he deserves another term in office if nothing else other than to prove he can actually competently run a country.
Personally I don't want Captain Wishy Washy (aka Kerry) running the country. We should never have been in Vietnam, but hey look at all the medals I got, and Nadir is just flat out scary. I feel sorry for anyone who votes this year.

[ July 24, 2004, 01:47 AM: Message edited by: cough man ]

StabMaster Arson · 07-24-2004, 03:53 AM

you see, cough man, you're looking at this all wrong. instead of looking for the lesser of three evils, you should look for the evil of three lessers. who's the most evil of the bunch, you ask? well, we could weigh up all the petty shit that Bush did in his younger years, but that still wouldn't compare to the fact that Kerry is the only one who has killed a man... unless you count all the people bush sent to die in Operation Iraqi Liberty...

I guess Kerry is the only one who had the balls to look at the men he killed as they died.

cough man · 07-25-2004, 01:27 PM

But do we want a president with the balls to kill a man with his own hands, or a president that is going to stick with what he says? No matter how much of a pussy it makes him seem. I think it takes more balls to stand up to an entire country and as their leader, make a decision that you know will piss them off, and stick with it.

[ July 25, 2004, 11:35 AM: Message edited by: cough man ]

StabMaster Arson · 07-27-2004, 12:34 AM

Your rationale is completely rediculous. You're saying that you want a president who will work directly against what the majority of the country wants. I suppose you could call what king georgie did and is doing "ballsy", but I think "stupid" would be a better adjective.

Unfortunately, I foresee another four years of him in office. He's a crafty lil scamp, I'm sure he's got a few tricks up his sleeve to boost his approval ratings. It really wouldn't suprise me if he pulled Osama out of a hat a couple days before the election.

BarryJive · 07-27-2004, 12:44 AM

the 87 billion for a war the we didn't fucking need sure didn't help the situation. wait...wasn't there a budget surplus at the beginning of his term. oh yeah...there was. now arent we in debt trillions of dollars? didn't bush want to cut veteran benefits by like 60% and cut the soldiers pay by like 30%? despite the fact that he was commited to giving the soldiers what they needed? hmmm way to stick to your guns on that one dubya. i always thought cowboys were good with guns.

Fruitacious B · 07-28-2004, 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by StabMaster Arson:
I guess Kerry is the only one who had the balls to look at the men he killed as they died.

Was that before he intentionally got himself injured, or after? How can he brag about being a war hero in a war he came home and protested?

07-24-2004, 03:44 AM	#1 (permalink)
cough man Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: A Gunslinging Generation Posts: 333 Internets: 10	Bush vs. Kerry vs. Nadir Who do you think? Honestly the only reason I would choose Bush is because he is just SOL for his last term. He basically got handed a bad economy and a country under constant threats from terrorists. I think he deserves another term in office if nothing else other than to prove he can actually competently run a country. Personally I don't want Captain Wishy Washy (aka Kerry) running the country. We should never have been in Vietnam, but hey look at all the medals I got, and Nadir is just flat out scary. I feel sorry for anyone who votes this year. [ July 24, 2004, 01:47 AM: Message edited by: cough man ]
	I hope you enjoy living on top of the world, when you die knowing you lived your life on your knees.

07-24-2004, 03:53 AM	#2 (permalink)
StabMaster Arson Roscoe P. Coldchain Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Stabbin Cabin Posts: 2,759 Internets: 1425	you see, cough man, you're looking at this all wrong. instead of looking for the lesser of three evils, you should look for the evil of three lessers. who's the most evil of the bunch, you ask? well, we could weigh up all the petty shit that Bush did in his younger years, but that still wouldn't compare to the fact that Kerry is the only one who has killed a man... unless you count all the people bush sent to die in Operation Iraqi Liberty... I guess Kerry is the only one who had the balls to look at the men he killed as they died.
	LEGALIZE CRIME!

07-25-2004, 01:27 PM	#3 (permalink)
cough man Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: A Gunslinging Generation Posts: 333 Internets: 10	But do we want a president with the balls to kill a man with his own hands, or a president that is going to stick with what he says? No matter how much of a pussy it makes him seem. I think it takes more balls to stand up to an entire country and as their leader, make a decision that you know will piss them off, and stick with it. [ July 25, 2004, 11:35 AM: Message edited by: cough man ]
	I hope you enjoy living on top of the world, when you die knowing you lived your life on your knees.

07-27-2004, 12:34 AM	#4 (permalink)
StabMaster Arson Roscoe P. Coldchain Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Stabbin Cabin Posts: 2,759 Internets: 1425	Your rationale is completely rediculous. You're saying that you want a president who will work directly against what the majority of the country wants. I suppose you could call what king georgie did and is doing "ballsy", but I think "stupid" would be a better adjective. Unfortunately, I foresee another four years of him in office. He's a crafty lil scamp, I'm sure he's got a few tricks up his sleeve to boost his approval ratings. It really wouldn't suprise me if he pulled Osama out of a hat a couple days before the election.
	LEGALIZE CRIME!

07-27-2004, 12:44 AM	#5 (permalink)
BarryJive Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Bloomington Posts: 358 Internets: 44	the 87 billion for a war the we didn't fucking need sure didn't help the situation. wait...wasn't there a budget surplus at the beginning of his term. oh yeah...there was. now arent we in debt trillions of dollars? didn't bush want to cut veteran benefits by like 60% and cut the soldiers pay by like 30%? despite the fact that he was commited to giving the soldiers what they needed? hmmm way to stick to your guns on that one dubya. i always thought cowboys were good with guns.
	I don't mean to brag, I don't mean to boast, but I'm intercontinental when I eat french toast.