General Right-Wing Fuckery.

[Der Fuhrer]

Is that article supposed to prove something? All I saw was the same bullshit rhetoric these queers have been citing for years now. I almost shit myself when they blamed the flooding in Pakistan on global warming.

[Mr. Blonde]

Not really, I just like egging you on.

[Der Fuhrer]

What do you think is the greatest threat to the environment? Note that the correct answer is one word. If you say global warming or greenhouse gases I will shun you as if you were an amish whore.

[DJ FC]

Originally Posted by Der Fuhrer

What do you think is the greatest threat to the environment? Note that the correct answer is one word. If you say global warming or greenhouse gases I will shun you as if you were an amish whore.

Humankind?

[Orgazmo]

Bears are much more dangerous than humans imo. A bear's actions can escalate very quickly (especially when food is involved) and they can easily destroy a human.

[Der Fuhrer]

Originally Posted by DJ FC

Humankind?

In a sense, yes. But it's not quite correct. The damage caused by humankind is a result of the correct answer.

[f3lix]

I hope the "new congress" wipes out the EPA.

[Der Fuhrer]

Me too, slutbox, me too.

[DJ FC]

Because you don't believe in negative externalities.

[Mr. Blonde]

Originally Posted by DJ FC

Humankind?

This, of course. Which is why the following statement is absolutely PREPOSTEROUS:

Originally Posted by f3lix

I hope the "new congress" wipes out the EPA.

...Are you kidding?

Why?!

[Der Fuhrer]

The correct answer is poverty. Impoverished humans do the most damage to the environment. Only by wealth can a society look to the superficial problems of sustainability.

[Mr. Blonde]

Der Fuhrer, sustainability is not "superficial". If we don't practice sustainability, eventually, a lot of people are going to die. The Earth isn't some magic neverending resource pit. I don't trust corporations to take care of the environment -- so few of them do it's ridiculous. If we don't have the EPA, we'd still need a government agency to look after the environment.

Do you even believe in evolution? Or do you think we were just put here to multiply and consume resources unhindered? How we treat the Earth is the most important thing about our existence. It's the only reason we are here.

[Der Fuhrer]

Tell that to the people who are so desperately poor that they can barely sustain themselves. They don't give a fuck about the Earth and thats why they over till the land, practice slash and burn agriculture, and basically erode the shit out of the soil. I'm sure they're more concerned with eating to stay alive. Only when a country is rich with excess can it start to take a long-term view of the world. I say sustainability is superficial because it is compared to having enough food to sustain yourself. If you want to help the Earth ecologically, you have to help people economically, not damn them for ignorance or apathy. And corporations help people more economically than anything on the planet.

I do believe in evolution.

[THEINCREDIBLEdork]

It's like a cripple fight in here.

[DDTempest]

Originally Posted by Der Fuhrer

If you want to help the Earth ecologically, you have to help people economically, not damn them for ignorance or apathy. And corporations help people more economically than anything on the planet.

I do believe in evolution.

Helping people economically does not help them intellectually.

[DJ FC]

Originally Posted by DDTempest

Helping people economically does not help them intellectually.

LOL WUT?

[DDTempest]

Originally Posted by DJ FC

LOL WUT?

Exactly.

[Mr. Blonde]

I'd say DDtempest has the most direct experience out of all of us of being able to furnish poor retards with jobs, and i'd also wager to say that simply having a job does not make you smarter.

[Der Fuhrer]

But it does make you better off...I think you're missing the point, and that's OK. I'm not here to educate you.

[Mr. Blonde]

Originally Posted by Der Fuhrer

Tell that to the people who are so desperately poor that they can barely sustain themselves. They don't give a fuck about the Earth and thats why they over till the land, practice slash and burn agriculture, and basically erode the shit out of the soil. I'm sure they're more concerned with eating to stay alive.

Then educate me, sir. What country are you talking about exactly here? America? Where all our poor are slashing and burning polluting the Earth massively more than corporations? Please, enlighten me as to when America can be rich enough with excess so that can it start to take a long-term view of the world.

[Mr. Blonde]

Der Fuhrer, you seem to like avoiding accountability. I'd appreciate an answer. Let's see how long you can go without using insults, little guy.

[DDTempest]

Originally Posted by Der Fuhrer

But it does make you better off...I think you're missing the point, and that's OK. I'm not here to educate you.

There are people that are genuinely retarded in this world. Lower class America is lower class for a reason, they are batshit fucking stupid to a point that would baffle you. These people are going to be so fucking stupid that its painful to watch no matter how much money you throw at educating them. The cycle of stupidity is essentially unbreakable at this point, you can't teach them to raise intelligent children, so those children (which are fucking plentiful) will repeat the process.

This is where I think my points are diverging with the realm of possibility for a few of you: not all problems are solvable with money. There is no amount of money you can throw at some people that will make them capable human beings.

[Mr. Blonde]

It's happening again: http://www.examiner.com/movie-review...-reilly-factor

Back in Feb: (full video, no editing shenanigans) Entire Jon Stewart Interview - Video - FoxNews.com

Also apparently my buddy saw this on FOX news just today...I imagine a video clip will bet up sooner or later.

Just heard this verbatim on fox news:
(Context is two news reporters discussing the democrats new logo)
Reporter 1: Ive always heard their logo was Karl Marx smoking a doobie.
Reporter 2: It was Karl Marx smoking a doobie with Woodrow Wilson, get it right.
Reporter 1: Yes, and having gay sex.
Reporter 2: IN California
Reporter 1 and 2 simultaneously : EWWWW.

[Dent]

Originally Posted by Mr. Blonde

and i'd also wager to say that simply having a job does not make you smarter.

I believe that having a job makes you less smart, more time spent doing something mind numbingly boring where you aren't taking much in, and less free time to spend doing things you like.
But maybe that's just my job.

[Der Fuhrer]

Originally Posted by Mr. Blonde

Der Fuhrer, you seem to like avoiding accountability. I'd appreciate an answer. Let's see how long you can go without using insults, little guy.

I was talking about poor, undeveloped countries. They are the ones who don't give a shit about the environment. Clearly the existence of people like you proves the fact that America, in its wealth of excess, has the means to divert attention to the environment.

And yes Blonde, sometimes I do avoid accountability. It's not for any other reason than the fact that we aren't changing the fucking world here, and sometimes I just really don't give that much of a fuck to get into it. Other times I am in more of a mood to write a well-thought-out post, this is not one of those times.

Why don't you go sodomize some little Asian boys.