Active, I PM'd you with some of my thoughts and knowledge related to my involvement in one of the several incidents you mentioned. There is an apparent fear of dissent permeating WCHS, and it is wrong. The administration has walked a thin line this whole year, and has crossed this line at least once. If they lied to student suspects to try to encourage false confessions, this is wrong. I also think the students, while violating the internet use policy, did not break the law, and did not deserve the punishment they recieved.
Bah, I think the website would make an interesting point, and yes, it could not be libelous (not slanderous, it's in writing...
).
[This message has been edited by victim (edited March 07, 2003).]