Looks like the 3 on 1 bashing continues...with Anky subbed out and Stu Pidassle subbed in. Well what the fuck are we waiting on? Let's begin...
Richter-
You say to refer to your cat urine post...I say touche. Looks like our bashings now have a new home...see you there.
Stu-
I honestly think that you have problems. Do you seriously think that your posts are funny? I'll be honest, I read the bashings composed by BDH and Richter (and even Anky...much less frequently) and I appreciate what they say because it makes me laugh. Now you pop up with a bash that is absolutely terrible. It has no reason to even be considered a shit-talk... You are one of the stupidest people on the board, when it comes to trying to express yourself in a semi-creative manner. Honestly...you're name fits you better than you could possibly have hoped for.
Stu, I looked at a completely random post by you. I didn't take the time that I did for Anky and look through all your posts to find the best example...I simply saw your name as the thread starter and went to it...the following is what I found:
In
this thread:
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Who ever is the biggest loser on this site I would just like to congradulate on being the biggest fuck off in the world. If you are the biggest loser on this site please reply.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I honestly do not know why you even try... Either get a little bit of style or give the fuck up...for the love of god, change something and do it quickly. Every character you type adds to your idiocy... You already have lost any type of respect that I could have possibly had for you. I guess you really have nothing left to lose.
BDH-
Like your last post...you, again, attack me in a bifold manner. To your "you have no life" claim, I say this: I already admitted that I did spend a reasonable amount of time on my last post; however, I completely justified it with the result. I proved my point beyond my expectations...thus, my goal was accomplished. With that in mind, I don't care what you think. Proving a point that has been debated with Anky for days is well worth 20 - 30 minutes of my time.
To your other point...of my name being based on the Vitruvian Man, I say this: Again, this comes down to a maturity issue. Laughing at the Vitruvian Man for having no clothes on is no different than laughing at a child the second after he is born for the same flaw. Da Vinci's point was to show that man, in his natural form, has perfect proportions. Emphasizing the "natural form" part, of course, he didn't draw the man in clothes. The fact that you cannot seem to look past this doesn't make me look bad...it simply makes your lack of intellect stick out like a nigger at a rally.
That's all that I have for you...for now.