Thread: Fucking kids
View Single Post
Unread 04-19-2004, 06:42 PM   #8 (permalink)
Orgazmo
COME ON YOU YANKS
 
Orgazmo's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 15,733
Internets: 311447
Orgazmo has a reputation beyond repute Orgazmo has a reputation beyond repute Orgazmo has a reputation beyond repute Orgazmo has a reputation beyond repute Orgazmo has a reputation beyond repute Orgazmo has a reputation beyond repute Orgazmo has a reputation beyond repute Orgazmo has a reputation beyond repute Orgazmo has a reputation beyond repute Orgazmo has a reputation beyond repute Orgazmo has a reputation beyond repute

Send a message via ICQ to Orgazmo Send a message via AIM to Orgazmo Send a message via Yahoo to Orgazmo
Post

I've never heard of anything like that being enforced...at all. Ebay's policy claims that they'll give you a warning on the first non-payment. On the second non-payment? You'll get another warning. On the third? You'll be banned. Simple enough.

In other news, how the fuck did the bid get up to 750,000 pounds in the first place? For that to happen, it means that someone else bid 749,999 pounds...

Also, if you look at the pictures on the news page, the monitor in the first picture isn't on the same page as the screenshot later on. If you look at the dollar figure in the first picture, it's quite a bit shorter than 750,000.

Combine this with this link, a link to the actual auction, and we'll see that, although the article did report the correct actual ending price, it said it was sold to different bidder..which is absolute bullshit. Along with this, a look at the bid history shows us that there weren't any retracted bids of 750,000 pounds.

I'm calling shenanigans on the entire article.
Orgazmo is offline   Reply With Quote