Yeah man, what was up with that anyway?
I totally missed that whole story but then I started hearing he said that.
What a refuck.
And actually, /here/ is the best quote ever. It's by some arshole art critiquer who thinks he is cool if he contradicts himself and sounds like he knows fancy words. Read this, it's a critique on Jerry Uelsmann's photography:
"The visually plausible but philosophically impossible situations presented in Jerry Uelsmann’s photographs contradict the essential information we have come to expect from photographs. By subverting the currency of literal fact, Uelsmann releases us from the constraints of photography’s mimetic function. No longer burdened by representation, we naturally return to our internal, nonlinear faculties of thought and feeling to savor the inexpressible resonance of his enigmatic visions. Vague, despite their sharpness and fine detail, and ambiguous despite our recognition of their constituent elements, his photographic montages are like dreams that slip past our perceptual defenses triggering a response but never quite revealing their meaning."
Is that the biggest crock of shit or what? This refuck is trying his damnedest to sound like he knows what the fuck he's talking about.
It's people like him who give horribly inaccurate representations of critics in general, and most of the art community. I want to take Jesus's military issue M16 and blow this guys fucking brains out.
[This message has been edited by Titan (edited December 17, 2002).]
|