[Percipere'Chan]

Okay guys, here's the point where your and my ontological arguments diverge paths. You take what the 'bible says' All as the word of God. My lack of doubt in my beliefs comes from my study of the bible's history and origins. Let's really take this point. I'm interested in the possiblity of hearing something new on this.

Some books made it into the bible. Some did not. There was a decision process there that lastest several generations. Several generations after that it was written down. I study to do what Jesus taught.

If you take what Jesus actually teaches and understand it through the time and minds of the people from his time. You don't get all this absolutism that you seem to be so confident in. And why not accept the best of all religions anyway? (we could go to Pascal's argument here, seeing as it gives good weight to monotheistic religions). I'll leave you with that and see what you have to say.