I think of it this way: every second round of every playoffs ever, they talk about "even though this team clinched home-field throughout with their phenomenal (**-*) record, you've got to wonder if the week off has gotten them a little out of shape, blah blah blah..." If that's true, why compound the problem by giving your starters 2, 3, 4 weeks off? I've just never seen any real evidence that keeping your starters in for wins in the late weeks has resulted in injuries debilitating to the team's success.
If the Colts win the Super Bowl, they will be remembered until the Conference Championships in '07. If they go undefeated, they will be remembered forever. Much is said about the need for a Super Bowl to solidify Peyton's, Marvin's, and Edgerrin's Hall of Fame bids, but look at what that undefeated season did for the reputations of Nick Buonoconti, (Shitty) Larry Csonka, and Don Shula... People would not talk about him being the best coach ever if not for that season.
|