That has some good points, but what I ment was that a deist god would create the world and then have nothing to do with it, and care nothing about it, which does leave room for evolution as a built in process. The problem is that, correct me if I am wrong, ID treats humans as special, whereas the desist god cares equally little about all of his creations.
What I like about that article is that it points out why a deist god and christianity don't mix, but where it fucks up bad is the mixing of the "Clockmaker" and "Watchmaker" (sucks that two very different ideas have basically the same name) The clockmaker is a metaphysical argument with some plausability, the watchmaker is a scientific observation that has pretty much been proven totally inaccurate.
The watchmaker idea came about from looking at complicated organs and such and saying they couldnt have evolved, when as the fossil record and our understanding of evolution grows, says they not only could, but would have HAD to evolve.
For a explanation of the difference of clockmaker and watchmaker that is probably better than mine is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clockmaker_hypothesis vs
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watchmaker_hypothesis
The watchmaker article mentions something I had to read in genetics and evolution that does a great job of explaining why the watchmaker doesn't work
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blind_Watchmaker