Experts Claim Official 9/11 Story is a Hoax
Here are some of the kinds of considerations that these experts and scholar find profoundly troubling:
* In the history of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise buildings have never been brought down due to fires either before or since 9/11, so how can fires have brought down three in one day? How is this possible?
None have been hit by planes
* The BBC has reported that at least five of the nineteen alleged "hijackers" have turned up alive and well living in Saudi Arabia, yet according to the FBI, they were among those killed in the attacks. How is this possible?
same names different people, misreporting, lies in an attempt to look brilliant
* Frank DeMartini, a project manager for the WTC, said the buildings were designed with load redistribution capabilities to withstand the impact of airliners, whose effects would be like "puncturing mosquito netting with a pencil." Yet they completely collapsed. How is this possible?
marketing 101
* Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700*F, the temperature of jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800*F under optimal conditions, and UL certified the steel used to 2,000*F for six hours, the buildings cannot have collapsed due to heat from the fires. How is this possible?
a few variables are thrown into the mix when a big fucking plane hits something at full speed
* Flight 77, which allegedly hit the building, left the radar screen in the vicinity of the Ohio/Kentucky border, only to "reappear" in very close proximity to the Pentagon shortly before impact. How is this possible?
[/b]Bad radar, bad reporting, low flying plane[/b]
* Foreign "terrorists" who were clever enough to coordinate hijacking four commercial airliners seemingly did not know that the least damage to the Pentagon would be done by hitting its west wing. How is this possible?
yes, the idea behind the attack was to damage the pentagon and render it useless, that was the point, that was the reason they did it. Also the fact that the plane was coming from the east had nothing to do with it, at all. And I repeat, the purpose of the attack was the actual damage, they hated the building, not the ideas.
* Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, in an underground bunker at the White House, watched Vice President Cheney castigate a young officer for asking, as the plane drew closer and closer to the Pentagon, "Do the orders still stand?" The order cannot have been to shoot it down, but must have been the opposite. How is this possible?
Wow, what an incredible, reliable souce. And what a goddamned odd thing to be saying, talking about orders and all, of course, the word "orders" is only used to talk about the government creating a massive incredibly odd conspiracy that kills a shitton of americans, including plenty of government workers, its in the CIA handbook that "orders" automatically refers to that, I read it. And this guy isn't whoring for attention, and remebers everything that happened that day in perfect sequential order, word for word.
* A former Inspector General for the Air Force has observed that Flight 93, which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, should have left debris scattered over an area less than the size of a city block; but it is scattered over an area of about eight square miles. How is this possible?
This guy is also not whoring for attention, and is still an active inspector general who had access to all the information, which allowed him to make an informed decsion on the matter, the word "former" is clearly a typo, he must certainly still be the Inspector General.
* A tape recording of interviews with air traffic controllers on duty on 9/11 was deliberately crushed, cut into very small pieces, and distributed in assorted places to insure its total destruction. How is this possible?
Since the evidence here is so apparant and specific how could one possibly not take this totally seriously. That tape could not have been destroyed for any other reason than to cover up a massive global conspiracy, just like the burning of the kennedy limo, it wasn't done to protect classified information, it was done to FUCK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IN THE ASS BY THE EVIL GOVERNMENT
* The Pentagon conducted a training exercise called "MASCAL" simulating the crash of a Boeing 757 into the building on 24 October 2000, and yet Condoleezza Rice, among others, has repeatedly asserted that "no one ever imagined" a domestic airplane could be used as a weapon. How is this possible?
This is entirly damning considering the fact that Condi has the memory of an elephant, and was given indepth briefings on every training exercise performed at the Pentagon, mainly the ones that took place before her becoming the NSA in January 2001. Also, that test could not have possibly been for the case of an accidental crash, and Condi could not have possibly been caught up in the moment and shocked that a bunch of crazy fucks decided to fly a loaded plane into a building, she would have been as totally unphased as the rest of the nation.
Their own physics research has established that only controlled demolitions are consistent with the near-gravity speed of fall and virtually symmetrical collapse of all three of the WTC buildings. While turning concrete into very fine dust, they fell straight-down into their own footprints.
These experts and scholars have found themselves obliged to conclude that the 9/11 atrocity represents an instance of the approach--which has been identified by Karl Rove, the President's closest adviser--of "creating our own reality."
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This article speaks for itself.