To me, the anger seems like a political bias under attack being masked as "frustration at illogical arguements". But I'm not a "smart person", so what do I know?
There are too many decent points made by both sides of this arguement for anyone to be 100% convinced one way or the other. Anyone convinced beyond 99.9% probably has some extreme political beliefs which is keeping them from admitting that this thing it at least a little tiny bit shady or a little tiny bit too unlikely to be a full-blown conspiracy.
|