Almost as retarded as this:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by f3lix
There is only one arguement that even needs to be brought against gov't sponsored education. Private Schools. They have owned public schools since their inception. I hope you don't need me to explain that further.
|
F3lix just accept the fact that you aren't good at thinking. Please don't try.
If the
only reason we shouldn't have public schools is that private schools "own them," then there isn't much of a case for abolishing public schools at all! All privately owned enterprises will be more efficient. But some (protection of private property, national defense, etc.) need to be supplied by the government or else they will never be supplied.
I was baiting you, teasing you, trying to get you to debate the real issue:
The benefits of government sponsored education outweigh the costs: because if education isn't free many people will not get it, and education has massive external benefits beyond the individual receiving it.
But you refuse to debate this; rather you say shit like "OMG THE TESTS AND OMG PRIVATE SCHOOLS ROCK!" You are a libertarian, but are too thick headed to debate basic issues; you just love to spout off idealisms.