Quote:
|
Originally Posted by f3lix
Here ya go Beebs, now you won't even have to google it.
Jul 26, 2006
(Columbus, Ohio) - Today, in an historic ruling, the Ohio Supreme Court unanimously held that the City of Norwood could not use eminent domain to take Carl and Joy Gamble's home of 35 years, as well as the rental home of Joe Horney and tutoring center owned by Matthew Burton and Sanae Ichikawa Burton, for private development—specifically, a complex of chain stores, condominiums and office space planned by millionaire developer Jeffrey Anderson and his Rookwood Partners.
In a unanimous and lengthy decision, the Court laid out a series of important legal opinions. The Ohio Supreme Court explicitly rejected the U.S. Supreme Court’s infamous Kelo decision of June 2005, in which that Court held that local governments can take property from one person and transfer it to another because the new owner might produce more taxes or more jobs than the current one—so-called "economic development." Second, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that state courts must apply "heightened scrutiny" to uses of eminent domain, especially when the property is being taken for use by another private party; according to the Court, lower Ohio courts should not simply rubber-stamp decisions by local government to take property. Next, the Court held that statutes authorizing the taking of property cannot be vague. The "deteriorating" standard used by Norwood "is a standardless standard," and the Court rejected it. Finally, the Court struck down Ohio's statute that allowed property to be taken even before an appeals court ruled that the taking was legal.
|
Thanks, I had no idea what eminent domain ment, what would we do without you? Eminent domain is the exception,thats why it must go to places like the Ohio supreme court. I understand the government does not absolutely protect property, since we do need to build roads and other infrastructure, but that doesn't mean property isn't protected as a whole. I'm not saying I agree with some of the absurd uses of eminant domain, but it is just assinine pretending the government doesn't protect the right to property.