You know, I find this kind of interesting. I don't really understand Paramount's logic here. I mean, while Cruise's off-camera antics might not be totally sane, why should that be reason not to resign his contract? His antics, weird or otherwise, draw huge amounts of publicity. People go see his movies just as much as a result of him constantly being in the spotlight due to his weirdness as much as they do for his talent as an actor. Who wouldn't want Tom Cruise on their label? Hollywood is full of nutjobs. Since when is no publicity better than bad publicity?
|