Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BigDongedHoe
That comment right there is showing little to no knowledge. Federer won 3 out 4 majors this year and in 2004, in 2005 he won 2 out of 4. The guy will go down as the greatest tennis player in the history of tennis and frankly I don't believe you will ever see anybody as dominant as he is, yes he is that good. Agassi after the 2005 U.S. Open final was quoted as saying Federer was the best player he's ever faced (that includes multiple matches with Sampras).
Nadal is to Federer as Mickelson is to Woods in both cases there isn't much competition.
Nadal beats Federer on clay and not even handily at that, coming from a tennis player playing on clay and playing on hardcourt is apples and oranges, literally. Thats why the fact that Andre Agassi actually won the French Open makes it that much more amazing.
|
First of all shut the fuck up with the little knowledge comment,
Hard: Rafael Nadal (ESP) leads 2:1
Clay: Rafael Nadal (ESP) leads 4:0
Grass: Roger Federer (SUI) leads 1:0
Indoor: Tied 0:0
Nadal consistently beats Federer when they play. Nadal is not the "greater" tennis player by any means, but he beats him, and not just on clay, he seems to have his number. Federer is probably the most dominant player ever, but you can't ignore his record against Nadal.
Phil vs Tiger isn't the same, when Tiger gets anybody, especially Hefty, in a 1 on 1 type situation on a Sunday, its damn near always Tiger who wins. Tiger has no one player that he doesn't own mentally, Federer has Nadal.