No no not pissed and I see your arguement, I am just saying that despite the head to head record I do not even see Nadal as somebody who is even a dent in Federer's armor because he has never beaten Federer in any major other than the french. I guess from my standpoint the french open is the least followed major among the tennis community simply because 90% of the time the top players in the world aren't even making the Quarter Finals. Nadal will go down as the best clay court player in the history of tennis IMO and Federer still tests him on clay which is even more of a testament to Federer. If Federer were to retire right now I don't believe he would go down as the best tennis player in history but 4 or 5 years from now without a doubt, I believe he is only 25. He will break Borg's record of consecutive Wimbeldons and eventually Sampras record of all-time majors. I guess its just to hard to compare Woods and Federer's dominance of their particular sports.
|