View Single Post
Unread 11-22-2008, 10:44 PM   #15 (permalink)
DDTempest
Ahoy Fuckbag
 
DDTempest's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: In a pineapple under the sea
Posts: 3,540
Internets: 187030
DDTempest has a reputation beyond repute DDTempest has a reputation beyond repute DDTempest has a reputation beyond repute DDTempest has a reputation beyond repute DDTempest has a reputation beyond repute DDTempest has a reputation beyond repute DDTempest has a reputation beyond repute DDTempest has a reputation beyond repute DDTempest has a reputation beyond repute DDTempest has a reputation beyond repute DDTempest has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heaven Can Wait View Post
I'm all for stem cell research, but testing on vulnerable people, be it babies, disabled, whatever, is wrong.
If it was a homeless person of sound mind then sure, but the government has no right to do this.
Also, I didn't read the article.
Vulnerable people? Like cancer patients? Wouldn't want to test out methods to cure cancer would we. AIDS patients? Same.

Of course the argument is "those people can volunteer and have a say in the matter." True enough, but until a baby is born fully able to reason and communicate as an adult, research to save newborns will have to be done without the expressed consent of newborns.

Haha, you said homeless person of sound mind.
DDTempest is offline   Reply With Quote