Quote:
Originally Posted by Ugly Bastard
It's pretty clear that amending Shaw's rep number back to where it was is an isolated case of tinkering with rep that is unlikely to repeat itself.
|
Agreed, but if the question to take Shaw down continues, I would either be doing this in vain or would need to directly interfere with a person's right to use rep as they see fit...which is the slippery slope on which I wish not to tread.
In other words, if everyone agrees that the Shaw thing has run its course, I'll happily add his rep back. Otherwise, I won't do it until there's a consensus on what is and is not allowed with rep...which isn't exactly an easy line to draw.