Amendment

[Fruitacious B]

Originally posted by Fruitacious B:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by AcTivE:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Fruitacious B:
So all you really wanted to say is that you're afraid that it might corrupt your presently non-existant children? Strong argument...

Yes it is. If you can not understand that, then the argument stops here.</font>[/quote]Great, glad we got that figured out.</font>[/quote]

[AcTivE]

Seems like someone doesn't think so.

Faggot.

[Fruitacious B]

You're the one that brought your non-existant kids back into it. Fucker.

I'm going to bed, you can go die now.

[AcTivE]

Non-existant kids represent the future. If you don't have concern about the future, then you are probably part of the non-voter turnout. Which again--you don't represent anything, because you are another crackwhore that sucks dick to get another fix.

Faggot.

[Fruitacious B]

Yes, for the past 17 years I have been a part of the non-voter turnout. Turns out that I can't vote until I'm 18. Looks like I get my shot this year. And I'm for damn sure not going to vote for a president that's going to try to write oppression back into the constitution. It's a load of conservative bullshit.

[Percipere'Chan]

Originally posted by AcTivE:
Percip:

I don't give a fuck. There is absolutely no love or Friendship in my posts, mainly because I am not gay.

Well put. Thanks for the critique.

[VOL]

Originally posted by AcTivE:
Non-existant kids represent the future. If you don't have concern about the future, then you are probably part of the non-voter turnout. Which again--you don't represent anything, because you are another crackwhore that sucks dick to get another fix.

Faggot.

One of the dumbest statements ever.

Originally posted by Fruitacious B:
Yes, for the past 17 years I have been a part of the non-voter turnout. Turns out that I can't vote until I'm 18. Looks like I get my shot this year. And I'm for damn sure not going to vote for a president that's going to try to write oppression back into the constitution. It's a load of conservative bullshit.

One of the best (most obvious) answers to that statement.

I too will be voting for the first time. Fruit, it's not oppression. Talk to the Jews, blacks, gays, and what not that were in concentration camps in Nazi Germany. That is oppression my friend. This is just a president doing what is best for humanity. His job is to uphold the values of the constitution and make any neccessary changes that he sees fit to protect our American way of living.

[AcTivE]

Originally posted by VOL:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by AcTivE:
Non-existant kids represent the future. If you don't have concern about the future, then you are probably part of the non-voter turnout. Which again--you don't represent anything, because you are another crackwhore that sucks dick to get another fix.

Faggot.

One of the dumbest statements ever.
</font>[/quote]Not very smart are ya?

[Saint DH]

Originally posted by Fruitacious B:
almost every post by either Dirty Harry or VOL is wrong. Plain and Simple. Fuck you both for your conservative, suburban hardass kid views of homosexuality.

Listen up you little bitch, fuck you for your hippy, liberal, gay loving, faggot ass views of homosexuality. And fuck that whore mother of yours for giving birth to such a useless human being such as yourself. Now get your ass back out on the street and get me my money, bitch.

Originally posted by Fruitacious B:

Dirty, Active, and anyone else that opposes gay marriage by the "floodgates" argument. There is no way that any "floodgates" will open because of gay marriages. Unless of course you count your own personal attachments to animals or inanimate objects, fuckers.

Oh really? There is no way? How do you know this? Can you see the future? What factual evidence can you give me that such a thing will not happen? I don't see how you can simply say "it will not happen". That's bullshit, it can very easily happen and it probably will. It only takes one person to open the gates, dumbass. It's not going to happen instantly either. Give it time and it will happen, no doubt in my mind. The more you try to convince me otherwise, the more confident I am in my conviction. Fuel for the fire, bitch.

Another thing, your posts are starting to piss me off more and more. You honestly need to remove your head from your ass, and with a head as big as your's, your asshole must be pretty loose. You're a mediocre poster-majority of your posts I don't even read.

Learn your place, motherfucker.

[ February 29, 2004, 07:12 PM: Message edited by: Dirty Harry ]

[silver and cold]

Ya know what, In that case, Im a hippy mother fucker too!
I have no problem with two men or two women getting married, it doesnt effect me!
So, start your bitching, lets hear it???

[Dr. Seuss]

That "floodgates" arguement that you keep sticking to is ridiculous. Last time I checked, both parties had to CONSENT to this whole marriage thing. Well, I don't know about you, but I'm pretty sure that courts aren't just going to assume that a cocker spaniel consents to being married to a 92-year-old man. This whole "floodgate" shit is like saying because abortion is legal, soon murder will be, too.

[St. Anky]

The government can't fix everything. I fuckin hate Bush, I hate him more than hot lesbians who won't let me hit it.

I'm with Silver and Cold, give the fuckers their rights. I've come to believe that homosexuals are born that way and it is wrong of me to judge them.
And what the hell is up with all of this "bad for the future bullshit?" If you want to look at it that way, then focus on other issues that are harming our future children. Clean water, food, drugs, overpopulation, clean air... all of these things are going to be what our children are going to have to deal with. We're creating problems for them now. If you truly care about the future, as so many of you say you do, then focus on bettering the world for their survival, then we can talk about marriage.

While im on the subject, I'm fuckin sick of all of you "wannabe" christians thinking you know all of the answers. One second you're saying homosexuality is wrong because it's an abomination to god, and the next you're calling someone a motherfucker or talkin about gettin laid. What the hell is that? Thats not the way a christian is supposed to act. Choose you fuckin posers.

[AcTivE]

Cocker Spaniel's can't talk.

Birds can though...

But would it stop at birds? What about the rights of individuals who can not express their feelings verbally?

[Beebs]

An amendment that restricts freedom? I think we tried that once already, pretty sure it didn't turn out to favorably.

[St. Anky]

They type.

[Beebs]

Oh, and Birds can't talk, they can mimic speech but not understand its meaning.

[AcTivE]

Originally posted by St. Anky:
The government can't fix everything. I fuckin hate Bush, I hate him more than hot lesbians who won't let me hit it.

I'm with Silver and Cold, give the fuckers their rights. I've come to believe that homosexuals are born that way and it is wrong of me to judge them.
And what the hell is up with all of this "bad for the future bullshit?" If you want to look at it that way, then focus on other issues that are harming our future children. Clean water, food, drugs, overpopulation, clean air... all of these things are going to be what our children are going to have to deal with. We're creating problems for them now. If you truly care about the future, as so many of you say you do, then focus on bettering the world for their survival, then we can talk about marriage.

While im on the subject, I'm fuckin sick of all of you "wannabe" christians thinking you know all of the answers. One second you're saying homosexuality is wrong because it's an abomination to god, and the next you're calling someone a motherfucker or talkin about gettin laid. What the hell is that? Thats not the way a christian is supposed to act. Choose you fuckin posers.

Don't be an idiot and bring the topic off what is being discussed about. THIS topic has concern for the future, just as those do too. Saying that 'we' should be concentrating the focus to those is stupid--it's basically just saying "Don't argue against this, I'm gay"

But seriously, all it is doing is redirecting the argument.

I've never said anything about Christianity and gays..at least in this thread. Haven't read through the whole thing...so I'm not sure who that is directed towards.

[AcTivE]

Originally posted by Beebs:
Oh, and Birds can't talk, they can mimic speech but not understand its meaning.

What is mimicing speech? They know enough to where you can say 'What color?', and they say the color. That's not mimicing speech.

[ February 29, 2004, 08:53 PM: Message edited by: AcTivE ]

[Mr. Blonde]

Once again, i stop reading this post for like 5 hours, and i have no idea whats going on. Cocker spaniels and Christian posers all over the place.

[AcTivE]

Jake takes it the ass. That's all you need to know.

[Mr. Blonde]

Thanks for getting me back on track.

[St. Anky]

Originally posted by AcTivE:
Saying that 'we' should be concentrating the focus to those is stupid-- it's basically just saying "Don't argue against this, I'm gay"

I'm saddened to hear that that's the only thing you got out of the entire post.

I'm saying you're argument is pointless. What the fuck does it matter if gay's get to be married? Where do we draw the line and say, "gays are allowed this many rights"? Equality is the basis of the constitution; all men equal. It gives us the freedom it was meant to protect and deliver. No matter what, legally, we have to go by that.

[VOL]

Originally posted by silver and cold:
Ya know what, In that case, Im a hippy mother fucker too!
I have no problem with two men or two women getting married, it doesnt effect me!
So, start your bitching, lets hear it???

It will open the door to other things that will affect the very fabric of America. Can't you see that?

[AcTivE]

Originally posted by St. Anky:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by AcTivE:
Saying that 'we' should be concentrating the focus to those is stupid-- it's basically just saying "Don't argue against this, I'm gay"

I'm saddened to hear that that's the only thing you got out of the entire post.

I'm saying you're argument is pointless. What the fuck does it matter if gay's get to be married? Where do we draw the line and say, "gays are allowed this many rights"? Equality is the basis of the constitution; all men equal. It gives us the freedom it was meant to protect and deliver. No matter what, legally, we have to go by that.</font>[/quote]Read Vol's post. Not sure if he's being sarcastic or not.

Yes, every man is created equal. Does that mean someone who wants to shoot up heroine can go down to the gas station and buy his fix? No, it doesn't. It's not acceptable by the society.

Yes--people can choose to live their lives that way, but 'marriage' is an idea that will effect everyone..

and I'm repeating everything i've said in previous posts, so i'll stop

[Fruitacious B]

Dirty,

Thank you for your lack of participation in this argument. Your consistent insults torwards posters seems to have completely outshadowed your desire to try to present a reasonable argument. If my posts are mediocre, yours have been just as bad. My place is the seat I'm sitting in, nothing new to learn there. Find your place bitch, I believe that place is probably the shit-talking forum, seeing as though you can't do anything but call names and bitch the entire time shitwipe.