![]() |
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The OST is about pride. Without the OST, you guys would shit talk in another forum...but there would be no clear-cut winner. With the development of the OST, the boards are less shit-talky outside of this forum, but more shit-talky (than before) inside. If you weren't in an OST, you'd want to "win"...but there would really be no way to do that. With that OST, you finally can win. That's the point...to win. When you guys were shit talking each other in bater's original thread, you both clearly wanted to win. Why would you not want to win just because you're in an OST?
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It was at the Nubblites' game that BDH suggested a 36 hour window for each OST post to be made. All around agreed and then it was made so. Of course, the moderator of the OST (UB is the moderator right now for MP & MGN) has the power to fuck with this window...but the standard will be 36 hours. Good day.
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Sex Kitten Milf fuuucck
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,704
Internets: 55974
|
Thank you for the credit on another note I agree with Anky and believe that Berts vote should not of been counted. The fact that he voted 5-0 simply out of his own person amusement (had nothing related to do with the OST) makes me believe that votes like that should not be counted.
:::BDH::: |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 73
Internets: 10
|
Just a few ideas for the OST since it seems to be dead with the current round. A tag team format seems like it could have potential. Two on two would be the way to go, as a three on three would be far too difficult to manage. Basically, you could have two members A and B face off against C and D. Either A or B would face C or D in Round 1, and then the partner would be tagged in for Round 2. In other words, just a normal OST with some minor changes.
The main advantage of this proposal is that it would allow for a higher quality post. Teammates could proof each other, allowing a more thought out bash to take place. Also, I believe the problem of OST apathy would be eliminated, simply because you're bashing not only for yourself, but for someone else. Finally, the last proposal I have is for a judging committee to be set up. While there is aleady a group of loyal members that scores rounds impartially, there are the occassional instances where a score defying logic shows up. Having a panel of esteemed Nubblies members would likely eliminate this fault. Just something to consider... |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,698
Internets: 10
|
After witnessing the numerous amount of times goatfucker has mentioned penises on this board, I think it would be safe to say he has an unhealthy obsession with them, and therefore would probably like to see that as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 13,643
Internets: 247330
|
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by goatfucker:
i'd like to see orgazmo versus ugly bastard<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> I would rate the chances of this happening somewhat close to zero. -Ugly Bastard |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Orgazmo:
I'd like to see my penis grow quite a bit.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> A little porn and a lonely hand can make that happen for ya there... Ugly - If I can take on Titan, then you could take on Orgazmo. Of course our match won't happen until the fall of next year anyways... |
|
|
|
#46 (permalink) |
|
COME ON YOU YANKS
|
I've added a "chat" feature to the message board in the last few days. Of course, no one ever uses it...but that's alright. Anyhoo...with that mentioned, I think I can propose an idea that I had when the board was in its infancy.
With the chat room, we can have shit talking in real time. Shit talking when each party has 48 hrs to come up with a message is one thing, but shit talking when each reply comes at the snap of a finger is something completely different. Some may argue that the winner of each OST is simply the person that cares the most. This would not be so in the RTST's (real-time shit talking). This is how it would go down... All spectators would enter the chat room, along with a moderator. The two shit talkers would enter with random names (Shit Talker #1 & Shit Talker #2, for instance). Everyone would know who the two people talking shit were...just not which was which. For example, if UB challenge Titan to a shit talk, we would all know that we would be judging UB Vs. Titan...we just wouldn't know if UB was Shit Talker #1 or #2...and vice versa. This would eliminate any prejudice that may occur due to friendships or enemy-ships. The details really don't need to be 100% specific right now...as I'm mostly just proposing the idea, but I'd like to see a reasonably systematic layout developed. Perhaps a system in which Shit Talker #1 (#1 from here on out) types out one line, then #2 replies with one line. All spectators would remain 100% silent while they continued to shit talk in a very take-turnish fashion. Example... 1 - I fucked your mom 2 - If by "your mom" you mean "my dad's asshole," then I guess you're probably telling the truth 1 - If I had meant "my dad's asshole," I probably would have gone ahead and said "my dad's asshole," but...since I didn't...I didn't. In closing, I fucked your mom 2 - So, what you're saying is that you fucked your own father in the ass. That's sick, dude. 1 - Listen, fucko, right now my penis is in your mom...that's the end of the story. 2 - Alright, let's cut the shit. My mom is dead, you know that. 1 - That's because I fucked her to death. This could continue for like 5 minutes or any predetermined amount of time. After the time is up, the moderator would close down the shit talking and all would remain silent. The moderator would say "if you think #1 won the RTST, type "#1" right now. All #1's would be counted. Process would be completed for #2. Winner would be announced and the thread used to challenge would be updated to reflect the winner...so they get proper respect from the rest of the board...in terms of shit talking. It's really just an idea. Of course, since no one even uses the chat room to begin with, it may not take off...but, if it was to happen reasonably successfully, we'd have to schedule them and get at least like 5 spectators to judge the shit. We could the moderator break ties if need be. I don't know, it's got potential... Thoughts? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|