It also might be a case of Dawkins being bad at what he does. He's brilliant, yes, but I wish in these scenarios he'd get into specifics. You can't let O'reilly get away with these broad statements of God without bringing it back specifically to Christianity. He said he believes in Evolution, but that there was a deity behind it. Well that's all fine and dandy, only there's no room for evolution in Christianity, since the Bible, the source of Christianity, clearly states that God created the first man and woman as we are today. If Dawkins would have just said that, and focused more on specifics, he could've exposed O'reilly, who's an obvious apologist.
|