Quote:
Originally Posted by f3lix
ID - Your idea for a 4th branch is fine, but putting government in charge of creating it is suicide to the cause. There would be more corruption involved in that branch than any other because they hold the veto pen to everything. Most "academics" are theorists who couldn't survive in the real world anyway, yet you want them in charge of our veto pen. Would these "scientists" be the same ones who Al Gore cited for his global warming campaign?
|
I don't believe the legislative branch is to the point of corruption where they couldn't choose valid academic institutions. They wouldn't consider the Church of Scientology as an accredited organisation they would choose places like MIT. Congress wouldn't choose the people who would be representatives in the 4th branch. Only form the initial body of Academic Institutions that determine who are representitives.