Thread: Fagits
View Single Post
Unread 08-08-2014, 02:43 AM   #35 (permalink)
Dent
Lost in Hilbert Spice
 
Dent's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Surrounded by knaves and fools
Posts: 3,505
Internets: 177361
Dent has a reputation beyond repute Dent has a reputation beyond repute Dent has a reputation beyond repute Dent has a reputation beyond repute Dent has a reputation beyond repute Dent has a reputation beyond repute Dent has a reputation beyond repute Dent has a reputation beyond repute Dent has a reputation beyond repute Dent has a reputation beyond repute Dent has a reputation beyond repute
Default

<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3 <3<3<3<3<3
F3lix, I like you. The following isn't me trolling or hating on you in any way.

Quote:
Originally Posted by f3lix View Post
I think you are an inherently good person who just lacks social education.
These guys are GREAT people and VERY good at helping others become great people.
Homos are homos, leave it at that.
I understand why people get pissed off with this nonsense.
DH is closer to monster than "inherently good" imo.. apply the felicific calculus.

Quote:
Originally Posted by f3lix View Post
your "Disease vectors" argument, is that if they truly do transmit diseases to each other at the rate you suggest, they'd all die off, which should make you happy. If they were all truly gay, they'd only transmit to other gays and not women.
The bit about mortality came right out of your trumpet. Can you not imagine a "disease" that extended lifespan?
How are we defining disease? value judgements? dodgy appeal to nature? (I'm interested in this)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Health&Disease
Naturalists desire value-free definitions based on scientific theories. Normativists believe that our uses of ‘health’ and ‘disease’ reflect value judgments. Hybrid theorists offer definitions containing both normativist and naturalist elements.

Quote:
Originally Posted by f3lix View Post
argument against homosexuality I've seen is that since they don't reproduce, they go against human evolution, which is bad for our species.
*toot*
What do you mean bad for the species? Same goes for DH with his "bad for economy" do you think the species/conmy is a unitary subject of experience?
China brain - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I'll argue that homosexuals are better for the MEMBERS OF the species than those that have had children (selfish bastards)
It's impossible to "go against human evolution" the mechanism of natty S that is, anyway.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Orgazmo View Post

...and let's not forget Repug's point about adoption, something that wouldn't apply to the above folks.
Pretty sure I could spunk out some children but If I ever raise a child it will be an adopted one, anyone with reason should understand why.

<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3 <3<3<3<3<3
Yes this post is a bit childish.
Dent is offline   Reply With Quote