View Single Post
Unread 01-27-2011, 06:50 PM   #2 (permalink)
heurisdick
Senior Member
 
heurisdick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 267
Internets: 4908
heurisdick has a reputation beyond repute heurisdick has a reputation beyond repute heurisdick has a reputation beyond repute heurisdick has a reputation beyond repute heurisdick has a reputation beyond repute heurisdick has a reputation beyond repute heurisdick has a reputation beyond repute heurisdick has a reputation beyond repute heurisdick has a reputation beyond repute heurisdick has a reputation beyond repute heurisdick has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zebrazebrazebraSHAFT View Post
Biological evolution is just as factual as the theory of gravity. We know approximately when life appeared on the earth, that it diversified over time, species are related via common ancestors, and that natural selection (Charles Darwin's theory of the origin of species) is the main force behind how species change and adapt over time. Those things are facts of evolution.

Just curious, what type of evidence would change your mind about Darwin's theory not being a fact?
I'll answer this on Blonde's evolution thread. I don't wanna get yelled at for getting off topic
heurisdick is offline   Reply With Quote