|
11-04-2005, 07:18 PM
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Gangnam Style
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DH's Massage Parlor
Posts: 6,383
Internets: 213510
|
While surfing along a poker website, I came across this article which I found to be great for anybody trying to understand how to play poker and move themselves to the next level. I am in the transition of middle to high right now, which has worked out much better than the middle.
U.S. Collegiate Poker League by Paul Herzog The Unlucky Middle Have you ever felt not just persecuted by the poker gods, but completed obliterated, abused, and left for dead? Do you say “Why me?” so often that your voice is shot and you’re reduced to writing it on chat windows and Post-It Notes? Believe me, you’re not alone. It happens to most players at one time or another, especially those who study the game, visit sites like CardPlayer.com, and understand how bad the odds against hitting a three-outer (or worse) on the river are. Sometimes it feels like the cards caught just don’t balance out, like you’re on the outside looking in far more than you should be. The conspiracy theorist looks at it as the rigging of online poker. I turned to a book from a high school English Lit class for the answers. In 1984, George Orwell details a sociological system of the Low, Middle, and High. Orwell used these terms to break down society by wealth, and more important, by power. In this case, I use it to talk about poker skill and how it pertains to luck. The Low player hits his gutshot-straight draws on the river and turns a rag to match his lousy kicker. The Low player cracks your A-A with 8-6, despite your big raises and aggressive play. Why? Because he doesn’t know enough to get out of your way. The Low player seems to have all the luck, because you remember his donkey suckouts and clueless calls long after he’s gone broke and left your table. The High player is a master of mixing up his play and understanding the implied pot odds of hitting a big hand with unexpected holecards. The High player has the ability to read opponents and game situations and to buy pots with rags, as well as the confidence to play his way out of bad situations, along with the fear factor that comes with that confident image. The High player cracks your A-A with 8-6 because he’s unafraid of your raises and aggressive play, and because he knows how to get out of your way if you really have a dominant hand. The High player seems to have all the luck, because his reputation makes him known as a player who wins big pots with bad hands. The Middle player usually understands pot odds, knows the top 20 hold’em pocket starting hands and the benefits of tight play, and he can usually stick to his guns and make some money when faced with an abundance of Low players. The Middle chases only when someone makes it the proper play, always gets rid of hands with bad kickers, and is only mildly bothered by missed opportunities and folding the best hand. The Middle player never cracks your A-A with 8-6 because he folds 8-6 preflop. The point of all of this is that the Middle player never seems to have any luck, because luck is rarely a factor in how he plays poker. His money goes into the middle only when it is pretty clear that he has the best of it. There is less gamble to the Middle’s game than the Low or High, by a large margin. The Middle’s reaction to watching someone splash around with second pairs and flush draws is almost always negative, as opposed to the High, who understands that the ultimate key to poker success lies in the ability to get maximum value out of the cards dealt to him. The Middle’s reaction to a big stack’s rags eliminating a short stack’s “good cards” is one of disgust, as opposed to the High, who understands that this is one of the benefits of having a big stack rather than trying to simply survive in a tournament. To the Low, poker is 80 percent luck, because he doesn’t know any other way to play it. To the Middle, poker is 30 percent luck, almost all of it detrimental to his game. To the High, this ratio is completely irrelevant. He benefits the least from pure luck, because he is making his own, not waiting for the poker gods to bless him on the river or waiting for a run of big pairs and nut flushes to build a monster stack. Just something to think about when trying to analyze ways to take your game to the next level, or wondering why your favorite poker site seems to hate you so much. |
|
|
|
11-04-2005, 08:34 PM
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
G'd up from the feet up.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cali
Posts: 7,146
Supreme Emperor of the Jiu Jitsu Shit Forum?: Yes
Internets: 114735
|
I started off that article apprehensive because I thought it was going to be about another high skill player cursing his luck when a low player wins the pot on a fluke. It actually turned out to be pretty good though even though I consider myself a mid player who plays recreationally, and happens to fit the definition given in the article close enough.
Helmuth is a shining example of why I was apprehensive to this article. A great poker player who I hate so much. I know he does that at least partially on purpose, but even when he's completely out of a tournament and he continues to cry, it rubs me the wrong way. Welcome to poker. If you were interested in 100% skill, maybe should have taken up chess. |
|
Creeping around as I please nonchalantly like any other Supreme Emperor might.
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2005, 02:14 PM
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Gangnam Style
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DH's Massage Parlor
Posts: 6,383
Internets: 213510
|
Quote:
On another note, I took down another fundraiser poker tourney for the Fraternal Order of Police tonight. My dad got third in his first live tourney, which was exciting for me. Ironically, it came down to me playing heads up with the same guy that I beat last time this place hosted this tournament. | |
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
