Nubblies Boxing: The Butcher vs. Schroeder

[Pliedes]

Wow, that's what I get for typing at 9 in the morning.

Anky, I'll start a thread on it, as "Judge not" is one of the most commonly misinterpreted passages out there.

[the_butcher]

St. Anky, here's what it comes down to.

1) I didn't start the shit of you butt fucking some ugly girl. I merely brought it into the equation because of the shere humor in it.

2) When you are god, then you can start telling everyone that you rule at religion. Until then, shut the fuck up.

3) Papsmear? Nope, still not funny.

4) The picture was designed as a tool to aid you in your obvious learning disability about the correct way to do certain things. While funny, it's intended purpose was not that.

5) "The Bitch"? How creative. At least mine is a prime example of your most obvious characteristic. And for the record, there is already someone with the nickname "bitch". You can find him here.

6) Lastly, you fucking suck. That's it. I don't need to put a specific example, because there are so many ways in which you suck.

I'm done. I'm bored and I need a new shithead to argue with.

[Titan]

I'm your huckleberry.

Kidding.

[long-since-forgotten]

So...ah...who's boxing who?

Or can we just make teams, and just have a Nubblies Civil War?

[BigDongedHoe]

Originally posted by St. Anky:
There is no clear way of proving that anal sex is wrong.

Would you like to wager on that? Since you wanted to bring biblical terms into this allow me to clarify. Basically the bible says that as long as you are married all forms of sex are allowed. Yes even the idea of rimjobs are brought up in a Christian marriage. However, anal sex is only talked about with homosexuality therefore it is considered wrong to do between two heterosexual people while married. So if you want to look at it biblically, it's wrong. The fact that you even went past kissing while not married is also considered "sexually immoral" and a sin. I'm not saying that's my belief, just what the bible says.

Originally posted by Pliedes:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by St. Anky:
There's no way you can lecture me on how YOU think scripture is deciphered.

When all constraits are taken into consideration and everything is analyzed in the correct context, there is very little room for mere interpretation. Most people just don't take the time to get to that level.
</font>[/quote]Yeah so how about you both being dead wrong right there? Ever heard of the Interpretive Journey? Ever heard of crossing the principalizing bridge? Do you know what "the river" consists of? I didn't think so....you should take Scripture & Interpretation before you start making generalized statements from your own personal views.

[ November 18, 2003, 08:22 PM: Message edited by: BigDongedHoe ]

[Pliedes]

BDH, I find it extremely humorous that your little stint at Grace has automatically given you superior knowledge of the Bible.

Your references to biblical theories and lame analogies don't change the basic meaning of scripture.

Secondly, I didn't even state my view of the passage, so how are you already passing judgement on my view?

I'm starting a thread on the topic as soon as an appropriate forum is up, save your babblings for that.

[long-since-forgotten]

SO WHAT IS GOING ON?!?
IS THERE ANY BOXING GOING DOWN OR WHAT?

[thekremlin]

Can boxing happen pls?