Will Have Sex for Food? - Nubblies.net Forums

Mister Bater · 02-04-2003, 10:55 AM

I was talking to my friend D.B. the other day since he had just gotten back from Vegas. He's a little out there so I wanted to find out how his trip went. Apparently, he was a little horny and found a hooker. Rather than pay her with money, he offered to buy her a seafood platter at one of the hotel restaurants. This struck me as a new low for him, which is pretty hard to believe since he just got out of a relationship with a 40 year old (he has a thing for the aging beaver). I'm just wondering what you think is more pathetic given the situation.
1. Having sex with a woman willing to put out for only a seafood platter
or
2. The hooker giving it up for a seafood platter
or
3. Using a 40 year old woman as a sex slave for the past 7 months.
I'm really stumped on this one.

02-04-2003, 11:55 AM

Definitely 2. That's all.

buckeye · 02-04-2003, 12:10 PM

3. Unless she is ungodly beautiful, that is freakin sick. She wouldhave to be one heck of a MILF to be screwing her for a 7 month time period.

Titan · 02-04-2003, 12:56 PM

3. I can understand putting out for a nice seafood platter. But a FORTY year old? Sick.

Ugly Bastard · 02-04-2003, 02:28 PM

All signs point to 3.

Yes, yes they do.

-Ugly Bastard

02-06-2003, 12:53 PM

The question wasn't which is more sick though, it's which is more pathetic. I'm going to have to go with number 2, giving it up for a measely seafood platter is probably one of the most pathetic things one could ever do.

Titan · 02-06-2003, 03:58 PM

Yeah, but resorting to a 40 yr. old because you can't get sex? That's pathetic.

Not as pathetic as resorting to a 13 yr. old though, right pliedes?

: )

02-06-2003, 07:10 PM

The age of the guy in this scenario was never given. He could be 105 yrs old...in which case a 40 yr old is pretty good.

Combat Chuck · 02-09-2003, 01:38 AM

I was thinking the same exact thing.

02-04-2003, 11:55 AM	#2 (permalink)
Orgazmo Guest Posts: n/a	Definitely 2. That's all.
Orgazmo Guest Posts: n/a

02-06-2003, 12:53 PM	#6 (permalink)
50 Cent Guest Posts: n/a	The question wasn't which is more sick though, it's which is more pathetic. I'm going to have to go with number 2, giving it up for a measely seafood platter is probably one of the most pathetic things one could ever do.
50 Cent Guest Posts: n/a

02-06-2003, 07:10 PM	#8 (permalink)
Orgazmo Guest Posts: n/a	The age of the guy in this scenario was never given. He could be 105 yrs old...in which case a 40 yr old is pretty good.
Orgazmo Guest Posts: n/a

02-04-2003, 10:55 AM	#1 (permalink)
Mister Bater Member Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 73 Internets: 10	I was talking to my friend D.B. the other day since he had just gotten back from Vegas. He's a little out there so I wanted to find out how his trip went. Apparently, he was a little horny and found a hooker. Rather than pay her with money, he offered to buy her a seafood platter at one of the hotel restaurants. This struck me as a new low for him, which is pretty hard to believe since he just got out of a relationship with a 40 year old (he has a thing for the aging beaver). I'm just wondering what you think is more pathetic given the situation. 1. Having sex with a woman willing to put out for only a seafood platter or 2. The hooker giving it up for a seafood platter or 3. Using a 40 year old woman as a sex slave for the past 7 months. I'm really stumped on this one.

02-04-2003, 12:10 PM	#3 (permalink)
buckeye Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 1,100 Internets: 10	3. Unless she is ungodly beautiful, that is freakin sick. She wouldhave to be one heck of a MILF to be screwing her for a 7 month time period.

02-04-2003, 12:56 PM	#4 (permalink)
Titan Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 3,698 Internets: 10	3. I can understand putting out for a nice seafood platter. But a FORTY year old? Sick.

02-04-2003, 02:28 PM	#5 (permalink)
Ugly Bastard Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: U.S.A. Posts: 13,643 Internets: 247330	All signs point to 3. Yes, yes they do. -Ugly Bastard

02-06-2003, 03:58 PM	#7 (permalink)
Titan Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 3,698 Internets: 10	Yeah, but resorting to a 40 yr. old because you can't get sex? That's pathetic. Not as pathetic as resorting to a 13 yr. old though, right pliedes? : )

02-09-2003, 01:38 AM	#9 (permalink)
Combat Chuck Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 2,063 Internets: 10	I was thinking the same exact thing.