Additions to the team - Nubblies.net Forums

03-06-2003, 06:21 PM

Because hammerdicks and I are assumed to be unable to play, it is necessary that our spots be taken by others. Woodward just called me and said that he was going to get Hodge signed up in a spot. Of course, this is a good move...but another is needed. Any suggestions will be taken.

It was thought out that it is a possibility that Lank and I would be able to return before the season is over and to play in some games. This was addressed by the fact that a team can have 12 players. Right now we have 9...so even if we could return, getting 2 people to fill in our spots would just boost our total team # up to 11, still leaving us able to play, just cutting down on time a little bit. All in all, it's not a bad deal.

Lethal · 03-06-2003, 09:45 PM

I'm all for toughing it out.

03-06-2003, 10:22 PM

If we got two new players, they'd probaly be a big help in the absence of Aut and Matt. But in the event they made it back for a the final games, I'm betting the new players would have no problem at all with sitting out, meaning no loss of playing time for guys who want it. Overall, i see the whole addition thing being nothing but benificial...

Trout Sniffer · 03-07-2003, 01:56 AM

I see where you guys are coming from, but I stick with my opinion that these 2 cannot be fully replaced and therefore I don't think we should try to. Although we would only have 2 subs, I think we should stick out the end of the season this way. I say that Orgazmo and 50 have the final say though, no doubt about that.

03-07-2003, 02:42 AM

I say it's up to you folks. I mean, if you want more people on the team, go for the gold, i'm not going to feel insulted in the least bit...but it's not like I'm going to sit over here and be disappointed if you don't get more people and lose b/c of a shallow bench...

Lethal · 03-07-2003, 03:18 PM

I am all for sticking with the guys we have. I think we have a good team as it is and I think we can handle it. If you are all for adding other members let me hear why, cuase right now I don't see in anyway why we should.

tonguegina · 03-08-2003, 02:27 AM

As I've thought about it throughout the day, I've decided that I think we should stick it out with the 7 of us. Bruny and John are still gonna be machines, Zach will still be knocking them down, Melvin's brings pleanty to the game, and both Brooks and I have found our shot these last couple of weeks. I honestly think we'll be fine, plus, we got in this not necessarly to win, but to have fun, and I don't think it'd be as fun with replacements.

Trout Sniffer · 03-08-2003, 03:16 AM

Well then , if you feel that we SHOULD get more players, vote yah, otherwise, vote nay.

Nay

Yay - 0
Nay - 1

Lethal · 03-08-2003, 02:25 PM

Nay

Yay-0
Nay-2

tonguegina · 03-10-2003, 01:42 AM

Most definately not.

Yay-0
Nay-3

Combat Chuck · 03-10-2003, 08:37 PM

Well, seeing as how yesterday provided a good example for endurance throughout the game and the fact that we didn't have problems keeping people in the game, I'm voting a:

Yay - 0
Nay - 4

03-06-2003, 06:21 PM	#1 (permalink)
Orgazmo Guest Posts: n/a	Because hammerdicks and I are assumed to be unable to play, it is necessary that our spots be taken by others. Woodward just called me and said that he was going to get Hodge signed up in a spot. Of course, this is a good move...but another is needed. Any suggestions will be taken. It was thought out that it is a possibility that Lank and I would be able to return before the season is over and to play in some games. This was addressed by the fact that a team can have 12 players. Right now we have 9...so even if we could return, getting 2 people to fill in our spots would just boost our total team # up to 11, still leaving us able to play, just cutting down on time a little bit. All in all, it's not a bad deal.
Orgazmo Guest Posts: n/a

03-06-2003, 10:22 PM	#3 (permalink)
pliedes Guest Posts: n/a	If we got two new players, they'd probaly be a big help in the absence of Aut and Matt. But in the event they made it back for a the final games, I'm betting the new players would have no problem at all with sitting out, meaning no loss of playing time for guys who want it. Overall, i see the whole addition thing being nothing but benificial...
pliedes Guest Posts: n/a

03-07-2003, 02:42 AM	#5 (permalink)
Orgazmo Guest Posts: n/a	I say it's up to you folks. I mean, if you want more people on the team, go for the gold, i'm not going to feel insulted in the least bit...but it's not like I'm going to sit over here and be disappointed if you don't get more people and lose b/c of a shallow bench...
Orgazmo Guest Posts: n/a

03-06-2003, 09:45 PM	#2 (permalink)
Lethal Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Warsaw Posts: 491 Internets: 10	I'm all for toughing it out.

03-07-2003, 01:56 AM	#4 (permalink)
Trout Sniffer Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Straight Outta Compton Posts: 1,003 Internets: 123	I see where you guys are coming from, but I stick with my opinion that these 2 cannot be fully replaced and therefore I don't think we should try to. Although we would only have 2 subs, I think we should stick out the end of the season this way. I say that Orgazmo and 50 have the final say though, no doubt about that.

03-07-2003, 03:18 PM	#6 (permalink)
Lethal Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Warsaw Posts: 491 Internets: 10	I am all for sticking with the guys we have. I think we have a good team as it is and I think we can handle it. If you are all for adding other members let me hear why, cuase right now I don't see in anyway why we should.

03-08-2003, 02:27 AM	#7 (permalink)
tonguegina I like dirt. Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Indianapolis Posts: 2,861 Internets: 2790	As I've thought about it throughout the day, I've decided that I think we should stick it out with the 7 of us. Bruny and John are still gonna be machines, Zach will still be knocking them down, Melvin's brings pleanty to the game, and both Brooks and I have found our shot these last couple of weeks. I honestly think we'll be fine, plus, we got in this not necessarly to win, but to have fun, and I don't think it'd be as fun with replacements.

03-08-2003, 03:16 AM	#8 (permalink)
Trout Sniffer Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Straight Outta Compton Posts: 1,003 Internets: 123	Well then , if you feel that we SHOULD get more players, vote yah, otherwise, vote nay. Nay Yay - 0 Nay - 1

03-08-2003, 02:25 PM	#9 (permalink)
Lethal Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Warsaw Posts: 491 Internets: 10	Nay Yay-0 Nay-2

03-10-2003, 01:42 AM	#10 (permalink)
tonguegina I like dirt. Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Indianapolis Posts: 2,861 Internets: 2790	Most definately not. Yay-0 Nay-3

03-10-2003, 08:37 PM	#11 (permalink)
Combat Chuck Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 2,063 Internets: 10	Well, seeing as how yesterday provided a good example for endurance throughout the game and the fact that we didn't have problems keeping people in the game, I'm voting a: Yay - 0 Nay - 4