![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Jelqing for Jesus
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte's spare bedroom
Posts: 3,079
Internets: 194538
|
I doubt it passes.
By:Naishtat H.B. No.1491 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to the medical use of marihuana. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1: Section 481.121, Health and Safety Code, is amended by adding Subsections (c) and (d) to read as follows: (c)It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under Subsection (a) that the person possessed the marihuana as a patient of a physician licensed to practice medicine in this state pursuant to the recommendation of that physician for the amelioration of the symptoms or effects of a bona fide medical condition. (d)An agency, including a law enforcement agency, of this state or a political subdivision of this state may not initiate an administrative, civil, or criminal investigation into a physician licensed to practice medicine in this state on the ground that the physician discussed marihuana as a treatment option with a patient of the physician or made a written or oral statement that, in the physician ’s opinion, the potential benefits of marihuana would likely outweigh the health risks for a particular patient.” An affirmative defense law means that if you are arrested for cannabis possession and are a patient who has a referral for a legitimate medical condition from a doctor here in Texas, you will have protection from being prosecuted and serving extended jail time after the initial arrest. While you still can be arrested even if you show your statement, when police are informed of the law change, they should hopefully realize that it would be a pointless endeavor to arrest and jail you when it will be thrown out of the court and cause undue cost to the state. This section also provides protection from criminal charges for doctors who would suggest cannabis to a patient, so that they don’t live in fear of being arrested or having their clinics shut down for being compassionate with their care. “SECTION 2: Subchapter B , Chapter 164, Occupations Code, is amended by adding Section 164.0525 to read as follows: Sec 164.0525. MEDICAL USE OF MARIHUANA. A physician may not be denied any right or privilege or be subject to any disciplinary action solely for making a written or oral statement that, in the physician ’s professional opinion, the potential benefits of marihuana would likely outweigh the health risks for a particular patient.” Basically, this prevents your doctor from being persecuted professionally if they choose to recommend therapeutic cannabis use to a legitimate patient. This protection is crucial in that it gives doctors the freedom to base your medicinal needs on pure science and not the lies pervading the medicinal industry. I would hope if my doctor is given a choice between a synthetic with a laundry list of side effects and a natural plant that is clinically proven to alleviate pain and suffering for a myriad of issues, they would pick common sense every time. “SECTION 3: The change in law made by this Act applies only to an offense committed on or after the effective date of this Act. An offense committed before the effective date of this Act is covered by the law in effect when the offense was committed, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. For purposes of this section, an offense was committed before the effective date of this Act if any element of the offense was committed before that date.” If you are arrested for possession before this act becomes law, which will be in September of this year if all of us can get it passed, you still will have to serve the sentence that is set forth for you by the courts. Cannabis use in all medicinal forms is still illegal here and they will still consider you a criminal if caught for possession. If that sounds completely insane to you, it just goes to show how incredibly foolish and short sighted our laws are right now and how much they need to be changed. “SECTION 4: This Act takes effect September 1, 2011.” |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Spice Master
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,969
Internets: 284106
|
Repug should write a short novel about Francis based on the original posts. I can almost guarantee that would sell more copies than any other literature he's bound to spew out. I'd buy 10 copies myself, give them out for birthdays
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
MURICAN
|
I created Francis.
|
![]() The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers and be capable of reading them. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| White House was 9/11 Target | DJ FC | News | 0 | 03-27-2006 07:55 PM |
| Kill Bill vol. III, Sin City 2, Grind House, and Vega Brothers | tonguegina | News | 8 | 10-07-2005 03:39 PM |