Nubblies.net Forums - Wtf Did You Google To End Up Here? - View Single Post - OST

Mantra · 05-26-2003, 04:03 PM

Where to start...

-Unhappy Beginnings-

First, let's look at the beginnings to all of this:

The background on ProffesorNumber:
He came to nubblies and started two different names: ProfessorNumber and SuperElectricBoy. He then proceeds to make a post about a pathetic website (a ripoff of http://maddox.xmission.net) he makes, and gives it a negative spin in an attempt to make it look like the link was posted by a third party. Then tried to use his other id to act like it wasn't him who originally posted it. He was quickly discovered and admits defeat when cornered. What a pathetic beginning.
He later bashes me for keeping my identity hidden by saying
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Ooooh, wow, you know who I am. Too bad you are too much of a pussy to even consider admitting who you are.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
This is funny, coming from a person who just started two accounts, try to act like they were two different people, and then lie about it. PN obviously also doesn't understand the anominity aspect of nubblies.

-First Posts-
But let's look at his very first post:

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>ProffesorNumber's first post on nubblies:
School sanctioned events are fun! lets all go and hold each other's dicks. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Here we see PN use homosexuality as a slam through sarcasm, or is visualizing a sexual inuendo he would like to live out. But we aren't sure yet, let's look at his next post.

After being insulted by Titan, he states
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>For God's sake, leave the gsa out of every comeback/insult. No one wants to hear it. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
We now know that PN has either contridicted himself by slamming, then advocating homosexuality, or he has validated the second theory that he is a dick-grabbing fudge packer.

Later in the thread, when I point this out to him, he gratiously conceeds this...
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Fuck off already, I'll give you the gay joke one. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Though we still don't know if he's a self-contridicting refuck or just a promiscious homosexual.

-The Comments and Attacks-

A large portion of his comments have been directed the Coffeehouse which took place at the high school and the establishment known as Courthouse Coffee. When he is continually fronted to give a reason on why coffeehouses are 'gay', as he so eloquently states, this is what it boils down to:
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by ProffesorSlappityDick:
1. Coffee houses are gay. Why?
Because they are populated by mindless yuppie idiots who need a "safe" environment to have "fun" at. Not only that, but a lot of these people think that they are more "high class" or intelligent because they like to hang out at courthouse coffee and drink coffee. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
The most humor thing about this is that PN states that he hasn't gone to any of the coffeehouse's at all, so how exactly can he tell us how gay they are? He can't.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Wrong. I don't go to courthouse coffee. I don't pretend to be sophisticated and adult like, when I know full well that I'm just an immature high school kid.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Just like he says, he never goes to Courthouse Coffee [and exposes himself for who he really is, an immature kid], yet he continually details supposed events which take place there. How? These are all unbased opinions, which he then tries to spin off as fact. Did PN do a study at Courthouse Coffee to see if the customers have a superiority complex? No, he didn't.
This tactic is characteristic of all his attacks and rebuttals; he never actually gives evidence to back up claims, he just makes them.

-More Bad Tactics-
But he has more up his bag of tricks, his other big tactic involves saying people who use big words are just trying to be intelligent.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>You use words like engulf, which make you sound like a total fucking idiot. No one says the word engulf.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
How do they make me sound like an idiot? You give no reason, except that 'no one says the word engulf'. The funniest part is, that you just used it twice. The entire concept of 'using big words' is one of his primary tactics, though he doesn't give a reason for this and often uses words which exceed the length of words used by others.

-And the stupidity flows-

ProffesorLikesItInTheRear also uses the coveted tactic of avoidance. He never really responds to anything said against him with rational, he merely disagrees and claims the attacking person is stupid. I honestly believe that he isn't smart enough to comprehend some of the things said against him though. Let's look at a conversation:
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Mantra's initial remark:You make all these claims about other people, yet you can still not demostrate how you do not fall prey to your own attacks. You have yet to demostrate any real intelligence at all. You simply reply to everyone's post with juvenile remarks and claim they're wrong; you don't give a reason, nor do you have one, but nevertheless you continue to lash out. You don't logically reply to any comments made against you, other just saying they're wrong and not giving a reason for it.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>ProffesorNumber's response:Lets just stop and think for a second about what she wrote. Did she give any reasons why I'm an idiot/wrong? No, there is not one spec of reason or logic in that entire paragraph of bullshit. Isn't it ironic.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I firmly state that he doesn't give reasons for anything he says and then makes juvenile remarks; so what's he do? Doesn't give a reason and say it's all bullshit. Ironic indeed.
I reply with:
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>MantraYou quoted an entire paragraph on why you're such a moron, then proceed to follow it by saying "it doesn't say why I'm a moron". You are the poster-child for stupidity. You continue to not actually give any reason to disprove the arguements made against you. With every post your ignorance is made apparent.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
And he responds with:
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>PN:I quoted that paragraph because it DIDN'T prove why I'm a moron. The only thing it proved was your incompetence. Lets review your alleged "proof" paragraph.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Again, just like I stated in the preceding post, he doesn't give a reason.
But being the nice guy I am, I try to very simply and basically spell it out for him, and yet he still does not understand.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Mantra:Again, you restate that it didn't prove your incompetence. Let's piece this together.
1 - Paragraph says P# is stupid because he can't give a valid bases for his attacks.
2 - P# claims said paragraph doesn't give a reason, when we all know that it did.
3 - I restate the paragraph detailing the logic of it.
4 - P# again says there is no logic to it.
Is anyone else seeing a pattern. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
In PN's first OST post, he actually quotes my paragraph where I tell him he doesn't back up anything he says, and states:
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>PNNext, FuckFace procedes to further prove his/her ignorance by telling me that I don't back up anything I say. You know why you are wrong? Because you are a spineless idiot. What proof is contained in that quote that even slightly suggests that FuckFace is right? There is none. Once again, he/she is being hypocritical, because for some reason FuckFace is above the law and doesn't have to back up any of his/her arguments. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Yet again we ask, where is his reasoning? "Because you are a spineless idiot." That is his logical reasoning. While I continually backup my arguments with endless quotes detailing his contradictions and stupidity.
He also quotes my closing phrase "Is anyone else seeing a pattern" and then says:
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>PNDing Ding Ding, I am! The pattern I'm seeing, is that all of your posts are incoherent and full of bullshit.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
My god, I don't think he could prove the allegations any more if he tried [though I wouldn't put it past him]
He also has said my sentences are incoherent and hard to read. Might this be because PN has a third grade reading level and is simply just a stupid refuck who cannot comprehend simple English.

-The OST Instigation-
If all of the above has not overwhelmingly proven to you the sheer stupidity of ProffesorNumbnuts, then the comments following the starting of this OST will.
While LongSinceForgotten brings up the idea of an OST, I claim PN doesn't have enough faith in himself to actually go through with it. When asked for his thoughts on it, he never actually states then, until this phrase:
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>ProfAssCrack It appears I neglected to answer the OST challenge. It doesn't matter to me either way. Your the one who is going to look like a dumb fuck. If you want to challenge me officially, start a new thread in the shit-talking section and I'll join in the fun.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
So if I want to challenge him, start a new thread. Ok, got it.
Now I want him to instigate the OST, so he will get at least one chance to lead off, and I say:
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Mantra-I'll let you go ahead an challenge. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Captain Dipshit doesn't understand though.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>ProffesorLikesTheCock What the Hell? You challenge me, then seem to think its my obligation to go first? You must be a fucking idiot. Don't challenge someone unless you are prepared to go. It's just the way it works dumbass.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
But I never challenged him, or started a new thread like he said a challenge would entail.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Mantra-I never challenged you, dumbass. I simply kept pointing out that you never commented on the idea of 10 members against you. I also find it odd that you are lecturing me on 'the way it works' when you can't even tell if you've been challenged or not. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>ProffesorDoesn'tUnderstandEnglish Aright, when you say to someone "Your thoughts on an OST seem to have escaped us", it implies that you want to challenge me. When you challenge someone, you are obligated to go first. Ask Orgazmo if you need it spelled out any clearer.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Well, obviously he needed it spelled out clearer.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR> Mantra -We'll ask Orgazmo, since obviously you do need it spelled out, does "Your thoughts on an OST seem to escape us" mean "I challenge you to an OST"? Last time I checked, they were two completely different concepts.Even when you say "it implies that you want to challenge me", you reiterate that I did not challenge you, because "want to" and actually doing are two very different things.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Well, needless to say, he finally realized the error in his way and started the thread. Stupid piece of shit.
Later in his OST post, he says:
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>ProffesorShitForBrains:You don't just challenge someone, then tell them to start it. Whatever happened to the times when men were men, and no one had to worry about pussies talking shit about them on internet forums. Oh wait, I know what happened. Fuckers like you ruined those times and started going to coffee houses and listening to emo. Eat Shit.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
1 - I never challenged you, but you can't comprehend that.
2 - When men were men? Since you are, as you state, just an immature kid, you wouldn't know.
3 - Where did emo come up in all of this? Your randomness makes me chuckle.
4 - Eat Shit? Capitalized? Is that the proper version of feces? Seriously though, thanks for once more proving my point.

-Closing Remarks-

This is only a glimpse into the utter ignorance which is ProffesorNumbers. He has proven himself to be a piece of defecation when it comes to all matters requiring rational, for he has shown an utter lack thereof. While he deserves to be taken out into the street and shot, the schooling he has received in this OST is a start.

I appologize to all who had to lose brain cells by reading comments made by ProffesorNumber. Hopefully he will do the right thing, and the coroner can cut him down from his homemade noose later on.

[This message has been edited by Mantra (edited May 26, 2003).]

05-26-2003, 04:03 PM	#4 (permalink)
Mantra Junior Member Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 14 Internets: 10	Where to start... -Unhappy Beginnings- First, let's look at the beginnings to all of this: The background on ProffesorNumber: He came to nubblies and started two different names: ProfessorNumber and SuperElectricBoy. He then proceeds to make a post about a pathetic website (a ripoff of http://maddox.xmission.net) he makes, and gives it a negative spin in an attempt to make it look like the link was posted by a third party. Then tried to use his other id to act like it wasn't him who originally posted it. He was quickly discovered and admits defeat when cornered. What a pathetic beginning. He later bashes me for keeping my identity hidden by saying <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Ooooh, wow, you know who I am. Too bad you are too much of a pussy to even consider admitting who you are.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> This is funny, coming from a person who just started two accounts, try to act like they were two different people, and then lie about it. PN obviously also doesn't understand the anominity aspect of nubblies. -First Posts- But let's look at his very first post: <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>ProffesorNumber's first post on nubblies: School sanctioned events are fun! lets all go and hold each other's dicks. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Here we see PN use homosexuality as a slam through sarcasm, or is visualizing a sexual inuendo he would like to live out. But we aren't sure yet, let's look at his next post. After being insulted by Titan, he states <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>For God's sake, leave the gsa out of every comeback/insult. No one wants to hear it. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> We now know that PN has either contridicted himself by slamming, then advocating homosexuality, or he has validated the second theory that he is a dick-grabbing fudge packer. Later in the thread, when I point this out to him, he gratiously conceeds this... <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Fuck off already, I'll give you the gay joke one. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Though we still don't know if he's a self-contridicting refuck or just a promiscious homosexual. -The Comments and Attacks- A large portion of his comments have been directed the Coffeehouse which took place at the high school and the establishment known as Courthouse Coffee. When he is continually fronted to give a reason on why coffeehouses are 'gay', as he so eloquently states, this is what it boils down to: <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by ProffesorSlappityDick: 1. Coffee houses are gay. Why? Because they are populated by mindless yuppie idiots who need a "safe" environment to have "fun" at. Not only that, but a lot of these people think that they are more "high class" or intelligent because they like to hang out at courthouse coffee and drink coffee. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> The most humor thing about this is that PN states that he hasn't gone to any of the coffeehouse's at all, so how exactly can he tell us how gay they are? He can't. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Wrong. I don't go to courthouse coffee. I don't pretend to be sophisticated and adult like, when I know full well that I'm just an immature high school kid.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Just like he says, he never goes to Courthouse Coffee [and exposes himself for who he really is, an immature kid], yet he continually details supposed events which take place there. How? These are all unbased opinions, which he then tries to spin off as fact. Did PN do a study at Courthouse Coffee to see if the customers have a superiority complex? No, he didn't. This tactic is characteristic of all his attacks and rebuttals; he never actually gives evidence to back up claims, he just makes them. -More Bad Tactics- But he has more up his bag of tricks, his other big tactic involves saying people who use big words are just trying to be intelligent. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>You use words like engulf, which make you sound like a total fucking idiot. No one says the word engulf.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> How do they make me sound like an idiot? You give no reason, except that 'no one says the word engulf'. The funniest part is, that you just used it twice. The entire concept of 'using big words' is one of his primary tactics, though he doesn't give a reason for this and often uses words which exceed the length of words used by others. -And the stupidity flows- ProffesorLikesItInTheRear also uses the coveted tactic of avoidance. He never really responds to anything said against him with rational, he merely disagrees and claims the attacking person is stupid. I honestly believe that he isn't smart enough to comprehend some of the things said against him though. Let's look at a conversation: <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Mantra's initial remark:You make all these claims about other people, yet you can still not demostrate how you do not fall prey to your own attacks. You have yet to demostrate any real intelligence at all. You simply reply to everyone's post with juvenile remarks and claim they're wrong; you don't give a reason, nor do you have one, but nevertheless you continue to lash out. You don't logically reply to any comments made against you, other just saying they're wrong and not giving a reason for it.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>ProffesorNumber's response:Lets just stop and think for a second about what she wrote. Did she give any reasons why I'm an idiot/wrong? No, there is not one spec of reason or logic in that entire paragraph of bullshit. Isn't it ironic.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> I firmly state that he doesn't give reasons for anything he says and then makes juvenile remarks; so what's he do? Doesn't give a reason and say it's all bullshit. Ironic indeed. I reply with: <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>MantraYou quoted an entire paragraph on why you're such a moron, then proceed to follow it by saying "it doesn't say why I'm a moron". You are the poster-child for stupidity. You continue to not actually give any reason to disprove the arguements made against you. With every post your ignorance is made apparent.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> And he responds with: <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>PN:I quoted that paragraph because it DIDN'T prove why I'm a moron. The only thing it proved was your incompetence. Lets review your alleged "proof" paragraph.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Again, just like I stated in the preceding post, he doesn't give a reason. But being the nice guy I am, I try to very simply and basically spell it out for him, and yet he still does not understand. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Mantra:Again, you restate that it didn't prove your incompetence. Let's piece this together. 1 - Paragraph says P# is stupid because he can't give a valid bases for his attacks. 2 - P# claims said paragraph doesn't give a reason, when we all know that it did. 3 - I restate the paragraph detailing the logic of it. 4 - P# again says there is no logic to it. Is anyone else seeing a pattern. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> In PN's first OST post, he actually quotes my paragraph where I tell him he doesn't back up anything he says, and states: <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>PNNext, FuckFace procedes to further prove his/her ignorance by telling me that I don't back up anything I say. You know why you are wrong? Because you are a spineless idiot. What proof is contained in that quote that even slightly suggests that FuckFace is right? There is none. Once again, he/she is being hypocritical, because for some reason FuckFace is above the law and doesn't have to back up any of his/her arguments. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Yet again we ask, where is his reasoning? "Because you are a spineless idiot." That is his logical reasoning. While I continually backup my arguments with endless quotes detailing his contradictions and stupidity. He also quotes my closing phrase "Is anyone else seeing a pattern" and then says: <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>PNDing Ding Ding, I am! The pattern I'm seeing, is that all of your posts are incoherent and full of bullshit.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> My god, I don't think he could prove the allegations any more if he tried [though I wouldn't put it past him] He also has said my sentences are incoherent and hard to read. Might this be because PN has a third grade reading level and is simply just a stupid refuck who cannot comprehend simple English. -The OST Instigation- If all of the above has not overwhelmingly proven to you the sheer stupidity of ProffesorNumbnuts, then the comments following the starting of this OST will. While LongSinceForgotten brings up the idea of an OST, I claim PN doesn't have enough faith in himself to actually go through with it. When asked for his thoughts on it, he never actually states then, until this phrase: <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>ProfAssCrack It appears I neglected to answer the OST challenge. It doesn't matter to me either way. Your the one who is going to look like a dumb fuck. If you want to challenge me officially, start a new thread in the shit-talking section and I'll join in the fun.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> So if I want to challenge him, start a new thread. Ok, got it. Now I want him to instigate the OST, so he will get at least one chance to lead off, and I say: <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Mantra-I'll let you go ahead an challenge. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Captain Dipshit doesn't understand though. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>ProffesorLikesTheCock What the Hell? You challenge me, then seem to think its my obligation to go first? You must be a fucking idiot. Don't challenge someone unless you are prepared to go. It's just the way it works dumbass.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> But I never challenged him, or started a new thread like he said a challenge would entail. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Mantra-I never challenged you, dumbass. I simply kept pointing out that you never commented on the idea of 10 members against you. I also find it odd that you are lecturing me on 'the way it works' when you can't even tell if you've been challenged or not. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>ProffesorDoesn'tUnderstandEnglish Aright, when you say to someone "Your thoughts on an OST seem to have escaped us", it implies that you want to challenge me. When you challenge someone, you are obligated to go first. Ask Orgazmo if you need it spelled out any clearer.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Well, obviously he needed it spelled out clearer. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR> Mantra -We'll ask Orgazmo, since obviously you do need it spelled out, does "Your thoughts on an OST seem to escape us" mean "I challenge you to an OST"? Last time I checked, they were two completely different concepts.Even when you say "it implies that you want to challenge me", you reiterate that I did not challenge you, because "want to" and actually doing are two very different things.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Well, needless to say, he finally realized the error in his way and started the thread. Stupid piece of shit. Later in his OST post, he says: <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>ProffesorShitForBrains:You don't just challenge someone, then tell them to start it. Whatever happened to the times when men were men, and no one had to worry about pussies talking shit about them on internet forums. Oh wait, I know what happened. Fuckers like you ruined those times and started going to coffee houses and listening to emo. Eat Shit.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> 1 - I never challenged you, but you can't comprehend that. 2 - When men were men? Since you are, as you state, just an immature kid, you wouldn't know. 3 - Where did emo come up in all of this? Your randomness makes me chuckle. 4 - Eat Shit? Capitalized? Is that the proper version of feces? Seriously though, thanks for once more proving my point. -Closing Remarks- This is only a glimpse into the utter ignorance which is ProffesorNumbers. He has proven himself to be a piece of defecation when it comes to all matters requiring rational, for he has shown an utter lack thereof. While he deserves to be taken out into the street and shot, the schooling he has received in this OST is a start. I appologize to all who had to lose brain cells by reading comments made by ProffesorNumber. Hopefully he will do the right thing, and the coroner can cut him down from his homemade noose later on. [This message has been edited by Mantra (edited May 26, 2003).]