Serious Betting quesiton! - Page 2 - Nubblies.net Forums

Cocktooth · 02-08-2011, 08:02 AM

They didn't pay, but we came up with a settlement that worked for both parties. The dreaded 100 dollar bracket challenge in March. It's pretty obvious that the first bet was a sucker bet, and this one makes it a little more fair. I should still win.

Orgazmo · 02-08-2011, 11:29 AM

That sounds like a terrible solution. Why did they take the initial bet if it was obviously a sucker's bet? Are they suckers? Do you teach suckers not to be suckers by letting them off the hook? Or do you hold their feet to the god damned flame?

Letting them off like this isn't teaching them anything. Let's say the next sucker bet they book is with a guy who isn't so kind. The kind of guy who breaks legs and rapes girlfriends. Now that's partially on you for not teaching them a lesson with this incident.

Cocktooth · 02-08-2011, 12:05 PM

Haha, I think that is a bit extreme. I'm sure if they bet someone that did all of that, they would pay up.

Ugly Bastard · 02-08-2011, 12:29 PM

Then it sounds like you need to be investing in a bat.

Saint DH · 02-08-2011, 12:31 PM

I think you've set a terrible precedent. Why should they pay you if they lose this bet?

I guess the flipside is that you don't have to pay them if you lose. So this really isn't a bet at all. It's a non-bet bet.

Ugly Bastard · 02-08-2011, 12:35 PM

Shaw's not really in the business of treating bets like they were actually a bet.

Cocktooth · 02-08-2011, 03:32 PM

I pay, it just takes me time to pay it. I save 5 dollars a week, and pay it off.

DJ FC · 02-08-2011, 04:29 PM

Shaw cut their line. Do not entertain further bets with them until they pay this one.

DDTempest · 02-08-2011, 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ FC

Shaw cut their line. Do not entertain further bets with them until they pay this one.

Yeah, they are clearly playing you ... freerolling a semi-honorable man with no intention of paying if they lose.

Cocktooth · 02-08-2011, 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DDTempest

semi-honorable man

I see what you did there. A 50% compliment is better then no compliment.

02-08-2011, 08:02 AM	#1 (permalink)
Cocktooth Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Warsaw Posts: 4,220 Internets: 124047	They didn't pay, but we came up with a settlement that worked for both parties. The dreaded 100 dollar bracket challenge in March. It's pretty obvious that the first bet was a sucker bet, and this one makes it a little more fair. I should still win.
	Nubblies: If we put up with Felix, we will put up with you too.

02-08-2011, 12:05 PM	#3 (permalink)
Cocktooth Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Warsaw Posts: 4,220 Internets: 124047	Haha, I think that is a bit extreme. I'm sure if they bet someone that did all of that, they would pay up.
	Nubblies: If we put up with Felix, we will put up with you too.

02-08-2011, 03:32 PM	#7 (permalink)
Cocktooth Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Warsaw Posts: 4,220 Internets: 124047	I pay, it just takes me time to pay it. I save 5 dollars a week, and pay it off.
	Nubblies: If we put up with Felix, we will put up with you too.

02-08-2011, 04:29 PM	#8 (permalink)
DJ FC MURICAN Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Virginia Posts: 5,136 Internets: 250185	Shaw cut their line. Do not entertain further bets with them until they pay this one.
	The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers and be capable of reading them.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

02-08-2011, 11:29 AM	#2 (permalink)
Orgazmo COME ON YOU YANKS Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Indiana Posts: 15,699 Internets: 305662	That sounds like a terrible solution. Why did they take the initial bet if it was obviously a sucker's bet? Are they suckers? Do you teach suckers not to be suckers by letting them off the hook? Or do you hold their feet to the god damned flame? Letting them off like this isn't teaching them anything. Let's say the next sucker bet they book is with a guy who isn't so kind. The kind of guy who breaks legs and rapes girlfriends. Now that's partially on you for not teaching them a lesson with this incident.

02-08-2011, 12:29 PM	#4 (permalink)
Ugly Bastard Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: U.S.A. Posts: 13,643 Internets: 247330	Then it sounds like you need to be investing in a bat.

02-08-2011, 12:31 PM	#5 (permalink)
Saint DH Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 6,143 Internets: 284753	I think you've set a terrible precedent. Why should they pay you if they lose this bet? I guess the flipside is that you don't have to pay them if you lose. So this really isn't a bet at all. It's a non-bet bet.

02-08-2011, 12:35 PM	#6 (permalink)
Ugly Bastard Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: U.S.A. Posts: 13,643 Internets: 247330	Shaw's not really in the business of treating bets like they were actually a bet.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
ABORTION: Why so serious?	Mr. Blonde	News	4	09-08-2008 09:52 AM
Nick Bollea (Hogan) In Serious Wreck!	Cocktooth	News	1	08-27-2007 11:03 PM
Serious pimp	Repugnant Abomination	General Chat	5	01-19-2007 03:29 AM
Serious question: Am I a stalker or simply a liberator with world class trolling?	Tenzin Palkyi's Savior	Shit Heap	1	01-27-2006 04:22 PM