![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Gangnam Style
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DH's Massage Parlor
Posts: 6,383
Internets: 213510
|
George W. Bush and Barack Obama have done it. They've pissed off Americans so much that Americans are creating their new party out of thin air. The Tea Party movement continues gaining momentum. While most media write off Ron Paul and every poll that shows he's more credible than they wish him to be, it's VERY hard to ignore what was just released yesterday.
Rasmussen poll of 1000 likely voters in 2012 presidential election. 4 choices. Barack Obama 42% Ron Paul 41% Prefer another candidate 11% Undecided 6% Holy shit! The link goes through all the questions and results. It shows the Tea Party movement is gaining MAJOR ground. This wasn't an internet poll, it wasn't a texting poll, it wasn't a call-in poll. A real, legit poll done by one of the most respected, independent polling firms in the country. Election 2012: Barack Obama 42%, Ron Paul 41% - Rasmussen Reports |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Ahoy Fuckbag
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: In a pineapple under the sea
Posts: 3,540
Internets: 187030
|
So roughly half of the people who took this survey didn't like Obama and assumed Ron Paul is a republican? That's what I'm getting out of this.
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
MURICAN
|
Agreed.
Same results for any republican candidate replaced for Ron Paul. |
![]() The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers and be capable of reading them. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 13,643
Internets: 247330
|
Jesus Christ. If I'm going to have to listen to two and a half more years of Ron Paul shit out of you f3lix, at least make it profitable for me. I'll give you 8:1 against him winning the nomination and 20:1 against him winning the Presidency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
MURICAN
|
I'll back 20/1s on presidency if I can lay 8/1s on nomination.
|
![]() The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers and be capable of reading them. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
MURICAN
|
I love Ron Paul.
And if you love him too you'll let the "Tea Party" movement die. Face it, that belongs to Palin now. We failed. Let the fucks have their fuckhood and never utter the words "Tea Party" again. You can, however, continue to triumph liberty. |
![]() The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers and be capable of reading them. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Gangnam Style
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DH's Massage Parlor
Posts: 6,383
Internets: 213510
|
Tea Party wipes several more GOP establishment candidates out. Wow. Either the Dems clean up this election in November or this country will be turned around with the election. This is going to be a glorious or tragic year. At least we've taken the establishment out of the GOP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Almost there...
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,979
Internets: 161638
|
Well, I'll say this: I've come to understand the absolute pertinence of the economy and what seems to work and not work regarding it. But even now, when my own state has the 8th highest unemployment rate in the country, I find it difficult to back a movement that is churning out candidates like Christine O'Donnell with such heinous social views. The fact that many of the popular candidates backed by the Tea Party do have such intrusively puritanical views that they very much would like to enforce seems contradictory to the social libertarian agenda the Tea Party was originally about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Gangnam Style
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DH's Massage Parlor
Posts: 6,383
Internets: 213510
|
Are you guys really saying that you would rather have the socialistic path we are heading towards instead of a party with ideas that are actually new and fresh? I don't agree with half the things the Tea Party now stands for, but I'd rather see a bunch of stalemates in congress than a lot of progress leading us on our current path.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Spice Master
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,969
Internets: 278288
|
That just seems like a dangerous line of thought for me. We can still try to change the establishment, or gain momentum with other possible parties, rather than sell ourselves to, in my opinion, a party with much more potential danger than the current R/D system. I mean, fuck man.
You'd vote for them even though you don't agree with half of their policies just because they're "new and fresh"? Isn't that kind of...the logic that put Obama into office? Not that i'm anti-Obama, but you sure are. |
|
Psychedelics are illegal not because a loving government is concerned that you may jump out of a third story window. Psychedelics are illegal because they dissolve opinion structures and culturally laid down models of behavior and information processing.
― Terence McKenna |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Gangnam Style
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DH's Massage Parlor
Posts: 6,383
Internets: 213510
|
I strongly believe in half of what they, too. While some may have some whack history (and which non-career politician doesn't) I'm not too worried about a woman who said masturbation is a sin (in 1994, on MTV, AND was prompted.)
I want a candidate who isn't going to compromise their vote to get a vote on some other issue. That's how this country got fucked in the first place. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
MURICAN
|
Quote:
| |
![]() The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers and be capable of reading them. ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |||
|
Level 20 Holothetan
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Space
Posts: 5,245
Internets: 210144
|
There is more to be worried about regarding Christine O'Donnell than just her social views.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Don't call me Shirley
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: London
Posts: 3,271
Internets: 220249
|
I would be much more concerned about this:
"Allegations of financial mismanagement have plagued Ms O'Donnell. In 2008 she defaulted on her mortgage and in 2010 the US government filed a claim stating that she owed more than $10,000 (£6,430) in back taxes and penalties. She has said this was a mistake, and a computer error. Although she claimed to have graduated from college in 1993, she didn't receive her degree until 2010 due to a dispute over tuition bills and required course credits. Accusations that she inappropriately used campaign funds - to pay her rent, for example - have also surfaced. " Default on mortgage-> should not be elected to any position where you manage public funds. Just one of my quaint beliefs. She also calls evolution a theory. At this point, isn't that like suggesting that the Copernican view of the solar system is wrong because the Bible says so? |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
Spice Master
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 17,969
Internets: 278288
|
Shutup Kremlin, the heliocentric theory and the theory of gravity are still only theories.
|
|
Psychedelics are illegal not because a loving government is concerned that you may jump out of a third story window. Psychedelics are illegal because they dissolve opinion structures and culturally laid down models of behavior and information processing.
― Terence McKenna |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| State of the Union address | Pliedes | News | 23 | 01-24-2004 06:45 AM |