Homosexuality is gay

[THEINCREDIBLEdork]

Originally Posted by Repugnant Abomination

Again, I agree with Dork. These homos are choosing to be flaming, they could easily change what they're attracted to. These people are going to hell by choice.

OMG cant you even read? I said I wish everyone was gay. not anything about hell.

what a moron, your exactly the type of bigot that needs to be rid of in this world. This thread you made sickens my soul. Gay people are people too

[Repugnant Abomination]

Fucking bullshit! My goddamn Editor wont run this in the paper. She thinks people won't get that it's satire and that it will reflect negatively on the paper and it's Editors. What a crock of shit.

[Repugnant Abomination]

Talk about gay!

[Ironic Mustache]

You know god damned well there'd be a million compaints about it from the retards.

[Repugnant Abomination]

Yeah, but that's also the point. I think the majority would get it, and the retards would write angry letters to the Editor, which get published in next weeks paper. The whole point is to be edgy and create debates. Everything is so bland. She told me she would be opened to printing it if I wrote about it "seriously", but who the hell wants to read that? You make it funny and satirical to catch people's eye.

[Ironic Mustache]

I disagree. That's the problem with the world this day, everyone wants to be edging and push the envelope. What people need is conservative journalism with just the facts. That's how I see it anyway.

[Repugnant Abomination]

This isn't a hard hitting report, it's a commentary. Sometimes the best way to engage an apathetic readership is to make them laugh.

[Mr. Blonde]

Originally Posted by Repugnant Abomination

This isn't a hard hitting report, it's a commentary. Sometimes the best way to engage an apathetic readership is to make them laugh.

e.g.: The Colbert Report and our entire generation.

[THEINCREDIBLEdork]

Did you know child molesters can't help who they are? They don't choose to be attracted to little children. Just like the gays and fags.

Does being a fag enabler make you feel like a big man? Does it make you feel like your edgy and progressive?

Does having sex with a child really ruin their whole lives like pop psychology says? These people that come out and say they were molested by their Uncles, coaches, and priests have jobs and spouses, families, houses, and cars just like everyone else. Are they really that worse off? Is it twiddling timmy's weiner really hurting anybody, or is the the only negative side the bad social stigma associated with it? I bet it feels good to timmy! Just like the fags and their butthole pleasures!

In many cultures having sex with children was OK too! Just like faggotry. The Ancient Greeks had little boy slaves whos asses they'd fuck called catemites. And if I may, some cultures think it is OK to burn Jews, the nazi's did! if other cultures do things we don't, obviously it must be human nature to do so and our American culture is just being ignorant because is always wrong about everything.

Those were just some entertaining things to think about! To make you see how some of these arguments pushing faggotry in this thread are somewhat flimsy.

The point I'm trying to get across is why do people feel the need to put homosexuals on a pedastal? Sure, I agree, theyre not hurting anybody and what they do should be their choice, and they should have all the rights anybody else has. But the moment I don't feel comfortable is when I don't feel I can snicker with my friend about the flamboyant fellow behind the counter. I am labeled a homophobe (by straight people!) and a horrible person because I am amused by deviant behavior just as I'd snicker at an old man freaking out because someone is on his lawn or a chick who comes over to your house and takes a shit on the first date.

Why do some straight people feel the need to write long columns about defending queers when there is so much more important fucked up things going on in the world today. I mean I could understand if you were a huge fucking faggot, and being a faggot is part of your everyday life. Then I could understand caring about fag issues. And what is with these people that are so opposed to gay marriage anyways, how is two fags getting married affect them in any way? Anyhow, do fags really have it all that bad in our society? Considering how fucking queer they are I think they have it pretty good in our society today as it is.

[THEINCREDIBLEdork]

homos shouldn't be able to adopt children. A single parent shouldn't be able to adopt either. Only a normal couple should be able to adopt a child so they can be socialized properly. And don't give me any of the bullshit about "how do we know whats normal?" (whiny voice) "Orphans," rofl. This isn't Oliver fucking Twist. Orphans get all their expenses by the government with free healthcare, much more than what we can say all the white trash families who have kids by the dozens are able to provide their children.

Why don't you homophilics take your fags you love so much and go live on an island with all of fagkind.

[THEINCREDIBLEdork]

you know, I'm surprised homophobes aren't pro-gay marriage. They'd be registered publicly and therefore we could easily keep track of these fucking perverts.

[Repugnant Abomination]

Originally Posted by THEINCREDIBLEdork

Did you know child molesters can't help who they are? They don't choose to be attracted to little children. Just like the gays and fags.

Does being a fag enabler make you feel like a big man? Does it make you feel like your edgy and progressive?

Does having sex with a child really ruin their whole lives like pop psychology says? These people that come out and say they were molested by their Uncles, coaches, and priests have jobs and spouses, families, houses, and cars just like everyone else. Are they really that worse off? Is it twiddling timmy's weiner really hurting anybody, or is the the only negative side the bad social stigma associated with it? I bet it feels good to timmy! Just like the fags and their butthole pleasures!

In many cultures having sex with children was OK too! Just like faggotry. The Ancient Greeks had little boy slaves whos asses they'd fuck called catemites. And if I may, some cultures think it is OK to burn Jews, the nazi's did! if other cultures do things we don't, obviously it must be human nature to do so and our American culture is just being ignorant because is always wrong about everything.

Those were just some entertaining things to think about! To make you see how some of these arguments pushing faggotry in this thread are somewhat flimsy.

The point I'm trying to get across is why do people feel the need to put homosexuals on a pedastal? Sure, I agree, theyre not hurting anybody and what they do should be their choice, and they should have all the rights anybody else has. But the moment I don't feel comfortable is when I don't feel I can snicker with my friend about the flamboyant fellow behind the counter. I am labeled a homophobe (by straight people!) and a horrible person because I am amused by deviant behavior just as I'd snicker at an old man freaking out because someone is on his lawn or a chick who comes over to your house and takes a shit on the first date.

Why do some straight people feel the need to write long columns about defending queers when there is so much more important fucked up things going on in the world today. I mean I could understand if you were a huge fucking faggot, and being a faggot is part of your everyday life. Then I could understand caring about fag issues. And what is with these people that are so opposed to gay marriage anyways, how is two fags getting married affect them in any way? Anyhow, do fags really have it all that bad in our society? Considering how fucking queer they are I think they have it pretty good in our society today as it is.

Damn dude, seems we've uncovered a little something some thing here. I'll start at the beginning...

The difference between a child molester and a fag is that a child isn't able to make that kind of grown up decision for themselves. Two homo's are both mentally developed enough to understand what's going on and to consent. Child molestation does devastate a kid - they might go on to lead normal lives afterwards, both the molester and the moles tee, but it's always something they carry with them, there's always some scarring. And while I agree child molesters can't help what they are, the difference is their actions do hurt other people, where homo's don't.

Do I feel progressive being a gay en abler? No. I don't feel like I should even have to. It's not about being edgy, it's about civil rights. It's pretty astounding to me that in the year 2008 people are still discriminated against because of sexual preference, race, religion, etc...I just happened to be poking fun at the homosexual situation this time. I've done a column on minorities before.

And this isn't at all putting homosexuals on a pedestal. It's about equality. Right now they're beneath heterosexuals, so if anything someone like you is on a pedestal. You seem to be displaying this idea of "reverse racism" where you feel like you're under attack for being who you are. It's not about that. It's about bringing people who are in minority groups up to your level so the playing field is equal. If you really want to get into it check out this book:

It's pretty good in identifying what I've been talking about.

Lastly, I'm with you, nothing should be too taboo for people to make fun of. I make racist and sexist jokes all of the time, and I think they're fucking hilarious. What I have a problem with is when the government and a lot of the countries people have clearly discriminative ideas and policies that put minorities at a disadvantage. It's a civil rights issue. When Martin Luther King was giving his speech it was for black people, but the same rules can be applied to gays.

[Repugnant Abomination]

Originally Posted by THEINCREDIBLEdork

homos shouldn't be able to adopt children. A single parent shouldn't be able to adopt either. Only a normal couple should be able to adopt a child so they can be socialized properly. And don't give me any of the bullshit about "how do we know whats normal?" (whiny voice) "Orphans," rofl. This isn't Oliver fucking Twist. Orphans get all their expenses by the government with free healthcare, much more than what we can say all the white trash families who have kids by the dozens are able to provide their children.

Why don't you homophilics take your fags you love so much and go live on an island with all of fagkind.

Your argument of "proper socialization" is bullshit because if gays were allowed to adopt children it would become normal, and therefore a child's socialize would be normal. The only thing that needs to happen is for gay's to be accepted as capable and compassionate members of society. The only reason your argument works is because there's still a lot of prejudice towards them. If this were the 50's you could apply this argument to black people by saying something like "Black people shouldn't be allowed to adopt white children because the children wouldn't be properly socialized and they would be looked down upon society." That is probably true, but only because the current situation was so fucked up!

And no, foster care sucks, being an orphan sucks, and if you think they'd be better off being a burden of the state than living in a home with two well off loving parents then you need to think about it some more.

[Beebs]

Uh, I think you missed the point, he isn't arguing against romos or for child molesters, he is making a very valid point about cultural relativism.

[Repugnant Abomination]

Yeah, I understand that. But I don't think something like the Ancient greeks butt raping young boys is a relative issue. I think we can pretty clearly draw a line in the sand about right and wrong when it comes to sex with little kids. But yeah, sure, the ancient Greeks did it, and they thought it was fine, so it's relative, but in extreme circumstances like that I don't think it is, it's just plain wrong, for reasons I've already mentioned. Obviously there are other more complex issues, but I sincerely believe that some cultures are just ass backwards and barbaric, like some Islamic countries that stone women to death that have been raped.

[THEINCREDIBLEdork]

Child molestation does devastate a kid - they might go on to lead normal lives afterwards, both the molester and the moles tee, but it's always something they carry with them, there's always some scarring.

Is that true? Or is that pop psychology speaking? Scarring?

Otherwise, touche.

[Mr. Blonde]

Originally Posted by THEINCREDIBLEdork

Is that true? Or is that pop psychology speaking? Scarring?

Otherwise, touche.

It is completely true. I can understand being critical of "scarring" if one has never had a scarring emotional and psychological experience in their life (which, with your sense of humor, i find hard to believe, but for the sake of this post I will), but it's the same psychological fuckedness that happens with anything...why a kid is afraid of water bc he almost drown when he was younger...why people don't get into relationships because they've been hurt so fucking badly and wrongly they never want to have that again...why a girl who is raped cannot trust any men.

I don't know, I find your question confusing. You are a very intelligent person; but you doubt the probability of mental and emotional scarring in a child who was molested...?

[THEINCREDIBLEdork]

I can't find the paper, but apparently there was a study on measures of neuroticism, depression, etc for people who were physically abused as children, sexually abused, and a control group who had neither. The differences between the sexually abused and control were moderate at best compared to the differences between physically abused and controls.

Anyways I'm just saying its interesting to think about whether it is the act itself or the social unnacceptability of being molested.

I don't even know why Im bothering to reply to you since youre not going to remember it anyways you dissociative doosh.

And in case youre wondering I'm calling you a doosh as a general term because youre dissociative not because I actually think youre a doosh.

[Mr. Blonde]

GOTCHA FUCKER

[Repugnant Abomination]

[THEINCREDIBLEdork]

[THEINCREDIBLEdork]

This is great: Response to gay is not natural argument

YouTube - RE: Gay Marriage-Is It Right Or Wrong?

YouTube - RE: Gay Marriage-Is It Right Or Wrong?

[Dent]

^ Lol wut. 0:58 he says 'garried to a may'

Kinda on topic with this, saw a louis theroux (obnoxious british asshole) documentary last night on paedophilia, if you're interested in paedophiles, it may just be for you.

BBC NEWS | Magazine | Where they keep the paedophiles

Can't find a healthy torrent yet.

RapidShare: Easy Filehosting

RapidShare: Easy Filehosting

RapidShare: Easy Filehosting

Torrent :
http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4859...XviD-NOsegmenT